NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper Manhattan
/
Morningside Heights
/
505 Seminary Row
Morningside Heights

505 Seminary Row,
Manhattan, NY 10027

18 Units

•

Built in 1905

•

6 Floors

4.4(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    56 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    2.83 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    May 16, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department fire retardant material at bulkhead
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    34
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 17, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... 6 sq ft at ceiling and south wall in the bathroom located at apt 31, 3rd story, 1st apartment from north at east original violation 16984843 issued 14-may-24 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    15
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    May 28, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 62, 6th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    T
    37-37 88th Street, LLC
    3.1(218)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    271 Properties•10757 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 519
    logo
    Maggie Mccormiuck
    3.1(186)
    Head Officer•
    248 Properties•9643 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 475
    N
    122nd Street Investor, LLC
    3.1(6)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    4 Properties•102 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    B
    Brian Garland
    4.4(1)
    Agent•
    1 Property•18 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    OK for a first place in the city
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Beautiful building, clean interior, cordial neighbors, not too expensive, fantastic water pressure and new appliances
    Cons:
    cockroach issue (but that's pretty normal around here), super doesn't clear snow quickly, frequent package theft, building front door lock is broken so anyone can walk in
    Advice to owner:
    Fix the door!!!!!
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here