NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Astoria
/
Ditmars-Steinway
/
20-59 31 Street
Ditmars-Steinway

20-59 31 Street,
Queens, NY 11105

2 Units

•

Built in 1930

•

3 Floors

2(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 20-59 31 Street
    no-listing
    Don't miss out on any new listings!
    Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    1 complaints
    See all complaints about this building in a rental report
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Duration in the past 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 months ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    2.5 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    4
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 12, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    0
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 24, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    B
    Bianca Diiorio
    2(1)
    Site Manager•
    Owner•
    1 Property•2 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Water Pressure
    Cleanliness
    Pest Control
    Heat
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Neighbors
    Garbage Management

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    Think Twice
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The price was good for the area, size, and the relatively quick commute into the city. There was also a good group of roommates in place and the upstairs neighbors were very kind and helpful.
    Cons:
    The apartment was dirty and falling apart when I moved in. Despite deep scrubs and attempts at pest control I was not able to make the place seem clean/livable. The place is also poorly insulated and the heating was frustrating since it was all hooked up to one thermostat. This causes the upstairs apartment and rooms to be way too hot, while the ground floor was still way too cold. There were frequent short circuit outages due to the poor wiring. Sadly the homeowner did not maintain the property well and would do quick and cheap fixes. The next-door neighbors are also extremely unfriendly and rude.
    Advice to owner:
    The property owner should invest in the property and make the space livable. They could also be more clear about their own lack of involvement in the management of the property. They could also be more polite when communicating with tenants.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here