350 East 67 Street,Manhattan, NY 10065
27 Units
•Built in 1910
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Review Summary for 350 East 67 Street
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent reviews at 350 East 67th Street highlight a mix of experiences. Tenants appreciate the cleanliness and soundproofing, but struggle with unresponsive landlords, delayed security deposit returns, and poor communication. Some mention noise from the bus stop and issues with plumbing. The building is lauded for being quiet, safe, and well-located, yet improvements in landlord responsiveness and management efficiency are suggested. While some approve of the building, others discourage renting due to management issues. Overall, potential renters should consider the trade-offs between convenience and landlord interactions at this address in Manhattan.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.07 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit at 350 East 67 Street is better than the city.
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jan 25, 2025: § 27-2033 adm code provide ready access to buildings heating system door locked at basement at boiler room
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Moshe Schmuelian
3.3(4)
Owner•
1 Property•27 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
J
Juan Aquino
3.3(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•27 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3.75 stars
1 month ago
Management is alright, but hard to get ahold of.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Hallways were kept clean, there’s good soundproofing in the building (barely heard ceiling noise or neighbor noise)
Cons:
Management is extremely hard to get in contact with, the landlord is old and often confused about what issues you’re having even after repeated attempts to contact. We also had multiple plumbing issues because of the age of the pipes and the landlord’s refusal to update them.
*EDIT: one of my roommates has still not received their deposit back 6 months after we moved out, after relentless calling the landlord kept saying he would put the deposit in the mail but never did. Our only option at this point is to pursue legal action.
*EDIT: one of my roommates has still not received their deposit back 6 months after we moved out, after relentless calling the landlord kept saying he would put the deposit in the mail but never did. Our only option at this point is to pursue legal action.
Advice to owner:
Be more aware of the tenants.
2.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Decent Building, Horrible property owner
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rent was affordable for the apartment space. Good location to Subway and other transportation.
Cons:
Extremely noisy block as it's right across from a bus stop. Landlord was extremely unresponsive and ignored repeated attempts to recover security deposit.
Advice to owner:
Do a better job at respecting your tenants.
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
It’s truly just fine
Former Tenant
Pros:
It was usually quiet, the staircase was clean, pests were rare, and the location was convenient and safe.
Cons:
The landlord was very unresponsive. He never answered texts and didn’t really answer calls with any regularity. A bird died in the net of the internal courtyard and the building management kept it there for months.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive!
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Would not recommend this building or management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The layout of the apartment was great. Bedrooms on opposite sides with an open corner kitchen that opened up into the living room.
Cons:
The management company was awful. Rent was outrageous for a 4th floor walk up. I had to file in small claims court to get the security deposit back. They also never answered the phone. Were unresponsive. Cashed rent checks at random.
Advice to owner:
Answer your phone/return calls.
When the heat cuts out in winter, fix it and communicate with the building tenants.
Provide security deposits in a timely manner.
Actually fix things and not just throw paint on it.
When the heat cuts out in winter, fix it and communicate with the building tenants.
Provide security deposits in a timely manner.
Actually fix things and not just throw paint on it.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here