NYC Buildings
/
Brooklyn
/
Bushwick
/
533 Bushwick Avenue
Bushwick

533 Bushwick Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11206

93 Units

•

Built in 2004

•

6 Floors

4.9(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    202 complaints
    Get rental reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    1.24 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    24
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 09, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective door at closet at east wall in the private hallway located at apt 6a, 6th story, 2nd apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    71
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 09, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... at celling (approx 1sq ft) in the bathroom located at apt 5c, 5th story, 2nd apartment from south at west original violation 17030156 issued 07-jun-24 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    21
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 15, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 5f, 5th story, 3rd apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    Riseboro Community Partnership
    3.3(7)
    Agent•
    145 Properties•2028 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 28
    S
    Schaeffer Apartments Housing
    3.3(6)
    Officer•
    Head Officer•
    132 Properties•1880 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 24
    R
    Rheingold Gardens Associates L.p
    4.9(1)
    Corporate Owner•
    3 Properties•126 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    S
    Sonia Rivera
    4.9(1)
    Site Manager•
    2 Properties•93 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    3 months ago
    It’s great
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The location is great spacious apartments
    Cons:
    Maintenance could be better