NYC Buildings
/
Queens
/
Rego Park
/
65-70 Austin Street
Rego Park

65-70 Austin Street,
Queens, NY 11374

45 Units

•

Built in 2016

•

7 Floors

4(6)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 65-70 Austin Street
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    1 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    22
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    May 24, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective lower split arm closing mechanism at casement window at north wall in the 1st room from east located at apt 408, 4th story, 1st apartment from south at west , section ''201-208''
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    14
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 20, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color ceiling in the 2nd room from east located at apt 604, 6th story, 4th apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    9
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 15, 2024: §27-2005 (e) hmc: provide written notice to the tenants at least twenty-four hours prior to essential service interruption by posting a notice in a prominent place within the public part of the building and on each floor of such building, where an owner must make a repair that may result in an interruption of essential services such as utilities(heat, hot water, gas, electricity, or elevator) that is expected to continue for more than two hours. sample notice available at www.nyc.gov/hpd or as provided in this notice of violation. lack of elevator service 311-20060402
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    E
    Eric Einstein
    4(6)
    Head Officer•
    2 Properties•58 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    H
    Hunter Reisel
    4(6)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•45 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    C
    Choice New York Management
    3.4(68)
    Agent•
    43 Properties•1633 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 22
    A
    Ann Davidson
    4(6)
    Head Officer•
    2 Properties•58 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (6)

    2 months ago
    I wish I never lived in that apartment
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Decent neighborhood. I have nothing good to say about the property itself.
    Cons:
    Too many issues with the building and the response was almost ignored at times
    Advice to owner:
    Sell your building
    Over 2 years ago
    New Property management needed
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Great super, clean building
    Cons:
    Property Manager needs more training
    Over 2 years ago
    Building Management and Brokers
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The building is nice, well built, great kitchens and apartment finishes for the most part. It’s mostly quiet except for when the trains go by. The super is so nice and will come help you out when you need it. He’s forgetful but all you have to do is text and he’ll be there.

    The rent is affordable but everything in the building is a la carte - parking, gas, storage, bike storage…etc.
    Cons:
    The BROKERS ARE TERRIBLE AND NON-RESPONSIVE. They also don’t communicate to the building when they’ve got a new tenant so we showed up and our apartment was not ready. It hadn’t been painted or cleaned. The heater/air conditioning systems are SO loud and they stop working a lot and have to be reset. The shower/bath system is ok - the shower knob has to be turned just right so that you don’t get water leaking. The front entryway always smells like dog pee regardless of how much they clean it. They like to show apartments on the weekends when the trains come by less often so you don’t hear it/feel it.

    The owners also came around to each apartment around the holidays to bribe people to post good reviews of the building. It was like $100 gift card or something because they knew it had tons of bad reviews online - how tacky.
    Advice to owner:
    Get new brokers. We knew we wanted the apartment but getting your brokers to respond was like pulling teeth. I didn’t even want to give your broker our cashiers checks because I thought he might run off with them.
    Over 2 years ago
    Great Super, poor property managers
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Nice and new apartment building
    Cons:
    Property managers fail to communicate, will take weeks to months to fix something
    Advice to owner:
    Hunter, property manager, needs to improve communication
    Over 3 years ago
    good building
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    cameras everywhere
    great super always a call away for any issues
    Cons:
    too many issues with the central AC & elevator
    Advice to owner:
    work on properly maintaining the building (ACs and elevator) so they don’t break
    Over 3 years ago
    Living at The Pointe
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Cleanliness
    Safe neighborhood
    Quiet
    Assigned Indoor Parking Space
    Super is very nice and helpful
    Elevators
    Rooftop with City View
    8 minutes walk from R/M trains
    Very close to groceries and shopping mall
    Cons:
    Property Management is unresponsive. Did nothing to help us in issues we were having at the apartment. Our phone calls and e-mails were never responded to.
    Advice to owner:
    Please change your property management.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here