70 Hancock Street,
Staten Island, NY 10305

26 Units

Built in 1975

3 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Review Summary for 70 Hancock Street
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews for 70 Hancock Street in Staten Island, NY, highlight concerning issues with cleanliness, pest control, and owner responsiveness. Some renters expressed dissatisfaction with roach and bedbug infestations, illegal practices by the landlord, and poor building maintenance. However, a positive review praised the apartment's layout, exposed brick walls, and proximity to public transport. Despite some positives like city-style living, the general sentiment leans towards not recommending this building due to persistent problems with pests, noise, and property management issues.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.76 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit at 70 Hancock Street is better than the city.
flag
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 11, 2024: § 26-1103 admin. code: post and maintain a proper notice on wall of the entrance story in english and spanish on the availability of the agencys housing information guide. a sample notice can be found at www.nyc.gov/hpd. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
12
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 17, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). missing in the entire apartment located at apt 2i, 2nd story, 3rd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 17, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 2i, 2nd story, 3rd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
Tomar Management Corp
2.6(3)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
7 Properties45 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
R
Robert Mack
2.6(3)
Shareholder
Head Officer
7 Properties45 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
B
Belair Ridge Development Corp.
2.6(3)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
7 Properties42 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
M
Michael Verdi
2.6(3)
Shareholder
Head Officer
7 Properties45 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 1 year ago
Bed bugs, roaches, human decomposition and lies.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartment layout is nice.
Cons:
The landlord regularly breaks the law. For years they sprayed illegal substances instead of dealing with a roach and bedbug infestation. Nepo contractor babies without a basic understanding of the law expect you to pay rent for a unit that isn’t inhabitable. Will retaliate because they are so stupid.
Advice to owner:
Nothing. You shouldn’t own buildings so advice is pointless.
Over 2 years ago
Would Not recommend
Former Tenant
Pros:
Absolutely no pros.
Cons:
Roach infested.
Very thin walls (you hear absolutely everything).
Cheap property management.
Over 3 years ago
Nice city style apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
exposed brick walls, loft style, close to train,
Cons:
No elevator, hallway is outdated
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here