Napco Realty Ltd.

Corporate Owner

•

Agent

•

29 Properties

•

365 Units

•

3.1(6)

Evictions: 16

Litigation History: Yes

Review Summary for Napco Realty Ltd.

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.

Recent tenant feedback for NAPCO REALTY LTD. managed buildings reflects a mix of positives and challenges. While some tenants commend the buildings' character, spacious layouts, and certain well-maintained common areas, issues with pest control, garbage management, and water pressure are frequent. Heat quality and noise levels vary, with some complaints about uncontrollable radiators and loud neighbors. Responsiveness from management shows inconsistency—some find communication timely, others face delays and neglect in repairs. Safety concerns have been raised due to problem tenants. Overall, expect older buildings needing attention, with management that can be either approachable or difficult to reach depending on location.

Open Violations

Only open violations from the last 10 years.

Data last updated 4 days ago.

The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.

BUILDING AVERAGE:

0.69 violations per unit

NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:

0.81 violation per unit

Non-hazardous

class A

i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals

MOST RECENT:

Apr 05, 2017: § 27-2011 adm code cleanse to the satisfaction of this department the stairs and floors all stories at public hall

Show all

Hazardous

134

class B

i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways

MOST RECENT:

Sep 20, 2018: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove the illegal fastening hasp with eye and padlock installed on door to rear yard , 1st story

Show all

Immediately hazardous

class C

i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts

MOST RECENT:

Dec 04, 2020: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code arrange and make self-closing the doors ,, in the entrance located at apt b3, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from north at east

Show all

Missing information/filings

class I

Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings

MOST RECENT:

Nov 19, 2025: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.

Show all

All Properties Associated with Napco Realty Ltd.

Ditmas Park

1222 Rear Cortelyou Road, Brooklyn, NY 11218

Units • Floors

0(0)

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown

Evictions: 0

Litigation History: No

1 Year Bedbug History: No

Crown Heights

1325 Rear Pacific Street, Brooklyn, NY 11216

Units • Floors

0(0)

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown

Good Cause Eviction: Yes

Evictions: 0

Litigation History: No

1 Year Bedbug History: No

Bay Ridge

8602 Ridge Boulevard, Brooklyn, NY 11209

60 Units • 5 Floors

3.3(3)

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes

Good Cause Eviction: Yes

Evictions: 4

Litigation History: Yes

1 Year Bedbug History: No

Borough Park

1115 63 Street, Brooklyn, NY 11219

38 Units • 4 Floors

0(0)

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes

Good Cause Eviction: Yes

Evictions: 1

Litigation History: Yes

1 Year Bedbug History: No

Reviews (6)

2 hours ago

Not the worst

Former Tenant

Pros:

Pre-war style housing, spacious bedrooms.

Cons:

Neighbor upstairs being super loud

Advice to owner:

No advice

6 months ago

Great building, ruined by 1 scary tenant

Former Tenant

Pros:

8612 8624 and 8602 are the same bldg. The building is clean. Regular pest control, no roaches in the units or basement. Laundry is sub par but available. Nice looking and well maintained lawn and property. Good location, responsive and kind management agency.

Cons:

Everything that’s great about this building is ruined by one terrifying tenant who they can’t seem to evict. This tenant hangs out in the front with his 3-5 unleashed pitbulls that he breeds in the apt. Harasses (physically and verbally) tenants, especially women. Dogs destroy the manicured lawn that everyone pays into.

Advice to owner:

Keep tenants safer

Over 1 year ago

Don’t do it

Former Tenant

Pros:

The courtyard outside is nice and thank God no rodents.

Cons:

The owner and property management and heartless slumlords, too busy buying up NYC and paying off politicians to even answer your calls. Takes them months and several calls and letters to get one response that is usually to go kick rocks. the super is 80 and can’t speak English, the floors feel like they could cave in, and they’re all railroad apartments.

Over 1 year ago

Impossible to contact management but love the neighborhood

Former Tenant

Pros:

Love the neighborhood, love the people in the building. Great apartment!

Cons:

Advertised to have washer dryer in basement but the dryer has been broken for months. Heat is uncontrollable, the radiator spurts and leaks. Garbage area is gross and rat infested. Management never fixes anything.

Over 2 years ago

Nothing gets done

Former Tenant

Pros:

The neighbors and the area are nice and close to the train.

Cons:

It's a very old building. It takes forever for any real repairs to get done. I've waited months for repairs to be finished. To the point of having to report to the city for repairs to start. There is a constant blame game between the owners, super, and management company as to why. there is also a really annoying traffic. Light outside that beeps all through the night.

Advice to owner:

Sell it

Over 4 years ago

Needs a lot of TLC

Former Tenant

Pros:

The building has character, open spaces, and a good heating system

Cons:

Has a problem with roaches, super isn’t as available as in other buildings, the building needs a facelift, not just paint over it, some of the windows can stay open, and the electrical is outdated