Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 06, 2025: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 19, 2025: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
All Properties Associated with Mitchell Gordon
/-73.990509,40.663024,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Greenwood
260 17 Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215
3 Units • 3 Floors
2.9(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (1)
2.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Absentee landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location and neighborhood are great. If you're young and don't mind fixing things yourself, then you can remake the place to your liking, especially if you live on the first floor with its access to the backyard.
Cons:
The landlord lives in New Jersey and does not keep this property up. It was cheap when I lived there just after college, but the landlord was always trying to get more money out of us. The landlord's inability to effectively find new tenants gave us leverage to resist some rent increases, but it still wasn't great having to ask to not pay more for a place that's only worth living in if it's very cheap. Every time you asked for something serious to be repaired, you knew it would come back to you next time the rent was to be discussed.
The place was simply in terrible shape. Some of the apartments are better than others, depending on how handy the previous tenants were. As for the property on the whole: there were certain steps in the stairway that you learned not to step on. We could store stuff like bikes in the basement, but, given the way the house worked, that meant the basement became a bit of nightmare with so much accumulated junk that archeologists could likely date layers of it by decade.
The place was simply in terrible shape. Some of the apartments are better than others, depending on how handy the previous tenants were. As for the property on the whole: there were certain steps in the stairway that you learned not to step on. We could store stuff like bikes in the basement, but, given the way the house worked, that meant the basement became a bit of nightmare with so much accumulated junk that archeologists could likely date layers of it by decade.
Advice to owner:
Maintain the property! If you treat your building poorly, you'll get tenants that don't care and will move out at the first opportunity.