The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.15 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
7
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 09, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective mortise lock set and assembly in the entrance located at apt 6fn, 6th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
7
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 07, 2025: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 2b, 2nd story, 4th apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with 225 East 26TH St LLC
Kips Bay
225 East 26 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016
89 Units • 7 Floors
3.3(6)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (6)
4.38 stars
10 months ago
Not bad, a little pricey
Former Tenant
Pros:
Spacious units (some even renovated), cool neighbors, very nice location
Cons:
Not the nicest looking building / lobby
1.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Don’t recommend this bldg
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good windows, good exposure
Cons:
Cockroaches, poor management, poor construction
Advice to owner:
Pest control
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not worth the construction
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great neighbors but
Cons:
Terrible management so be wary
4.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Generally good experience
Former Tenant
Pros:
Overall the experience in this building has been good -- the management responds reasonably fast to emails (usually within 2-3 business days but sometimes longer). The super is AMAZING -- cannot speak highly enough about him and the maintenance staff.
Cons:
The main issue is that the management seems to neglect bills and staff -- we receive several notices from ConEd saying that the building electric (for common areas) will be shut off imminently due to unpaid bills, and the management dragged their feet for a while on signing the union contract for the super and management staff.
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Lived here for 14 years
Former Tenant
Pros:
Used to be a good building Mark was an awesome super Tony was an awesome porter Great location Good people
Cons:
Property management was a total joke. I thought the initial property management company was bad, the new company tried to raise our rent ridiculously and we left……
Advice to owner:
This used to be a great building, I wouldn’t say nice or luxurious, but it was simple and there were good people. The property management company changed and these new hip kids thought they could turn this piece of crap building into a “luxury” building. No dice, it’s not that kind of building. We left to move to a very nice, large doorman building on the upper west side for a fraction of the cost which they tried to raise our rent to.
3.62 stars
Over 4 years ago
First NYC Apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Mark, the super, is great. Quick to address issues. Lived here prior to recent renovations and decent layout for a studio. Has elevator and laundry in basement.
Cons:
Management isn’t very responsive and sometimes not in a timely manner. Noise level has increased recently. No rooftop/outdoor space. Overpriced.