The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.37 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 11, 2019: § 27-2053 adm code post sign on wall of entrance story bearing name, address including apartment number if any, and telephone number of superintendent, janitor or housekeeper. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
10
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 23, 2025: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes flower pots at the building front south at fire escape, 2nd story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
12
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jan 03, 2024: § 27-2033 adm code provide ready access to buildings heating system door locked at basement at boiler room
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 17, 2025: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
All Properties Associated with Keivan Farhadian
All Upper West Side
82 W 105 St, Manhattan, NY 10025
16 Units • 5 Floors
3(11)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Central Harlem
2835 Frederick Douglass Boulevard, Manhattan, NY 10039
8 Units • 5 Floors
2.6(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (13)
3.38 stars
8 months ago
Pretty good overall
Former Tenant
Pros:
Decent space with relatively good super Close to cool stuff
Cons:
Above a night club that plays music all night on weekends
4.5 stars
11 months ago
Convenient Location and Responsive Landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location, quiet neighbors, very low key. Garbage management was very good and the landlord and super were very responsive to any issues. No issues with pests, regular fumigation. Laundry was easy.
Cons:
Had issues with my water heater, but the landlord/super was always there to fix it quickly.
Advice to owner:
Might need to replace water heater in unit.
5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great, Affordable Property with Honest Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
My partner and I lived at 82 West 105th for almost two years. We absolutely recommend the building. The landlord was very nice and easy to work with and the super is also really friendly. And the apartments are reasonably priced for the area, unlike many other apartments nearby.
The building is extremely quiet; it felt like no one lived there. No shenanigans, mostly chill Columbia students, and the building is built like a tank. We heard our upstairs neighbor maybe twice in the time we lived there. By far quietest building we've ever lived in.
The community garden next door is an asset if you're on that side of the building like we were; it's nice to just have an open space outside your window and not directly facing another building.
There are tons of really friendly long-time residents who live on this street. I really don't agree with or understand some of the bad reviews for this building. If you don't want to spend a fortune, want to be in UWS and near the park, this place is a perfect option. These are affordable apartments in a quiet building with quiet, safe neighbors. We really had nothing worth mentioning to be upset about.
Cons:
There's really nothing important to complain about, we were totally happy living there for a couple years.
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
avoid this building. you can find better.
Former Tenant
Pros:
the rent was the cheapest i could find for a studio, it’s near a bunch of great food, and pretty close to transit stops
management recently added a laundry room in the basement, which is convenient since it is open 24/7 (closest laundromat has last wash at 8:30), BUT to get to the laundry room you need to walk through a pretty gross private alleyway. the alleyway is open to the elements.
Cons:
it took about a month to get the heat working properly in my apartment— I was not notified of the unit having heat issues before signing my lease, (no heat for a MONTH in March) and i had to prompt management several times for updates for them to take action (ex management ordered new thermostat, they did not install until i asked for an update on the situation— meanwhile my heat was auto-set to it’s highest setting, con ed charging me for it) (+ management being entirely unhelpful, providing no heat alternative, and telling me I had to work with ConEd to get the meter unlocked when it was locked due to management not paying electricity bills inbetween tenants)
i have also had MANY packages stolen if left by the mailboxes for more than a few hours (definitely not ideal if you have something delivered while you’re at work)
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
west side best
Former Tenant
Pros:
love the area and. the neighbors
Cons:
nos very good at fixing things or flexibility with tenants. Owners are very strict
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Pests and bad management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, price, neighbors
Cons:
Very rude property manager (just the lady, the other guys are fine). Like yells at you over the phone kind of rude. When we moved in, we were killing about twenty roaches a day. Tried calling and emailing management and the super multiple times. Never got a response from either. The super here is terrible and management straight up ignores maintenance requests. If you want anything to get done, you’ll have to just show up at their office.
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Okay but beware of pests
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice quiet area, good food and close ish to grocery stores
Cons:
Rats infestation throughout the building
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive to tenants via comms
1.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Dont move here
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighborhood and the closeness to Central Park
Cons:
Management doesn’t respond to emails. Refuse to fix window leaks.
Advice to owner:
Sell the building to someone who will do their job
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Shabby building, barebones apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great neighbor community in building, friendly neighborhood, community garden next door, management office in building.
Cons:
Maintenance of building not great, packages pile up, entryway stinks of trash. Management not always responsive. Mice in apartment.
Advice to owner:
Clean the entryway/mailbox area more.
1.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
82 west 105
Former Tenant
Pros:
Love my neighbors.
Cons:
Not a fan of management. Owners are cheap and greedy.
Advice to owner:
Use a contractor to fix things. Not the super.
1.88 stars
Over 4 years ago
You can find better
Former Tenant
Pros:
New, renovated, nearby essential places (laundry and grocery stores)
Cons:
Illegal plumbing from restaurant downstairs caused whole building to not have heat or hot water for quite a while in the middle of a polar vortex
Advice to owner:
Be proactive.
4.38 stars
Over 4 years ago
Good starter NYC apt
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, large bathrooms for NYC apartments, monthly pest control, very responsive management.
Cons:
Windows are single pane and poorly insulated so winter is a bit cold (or expensive if you want to shell out for heat).
Advice to owner:
Include heat in rent.
2.88 stars
Over 4 years ago
Management slow to respond
Former Tenant
Pros:
Sunlight Garden next door Across the street from laundromat Super installs your AC for you
Cons:
Management is slow to respond to issues via phone and email so if you have an issue on the weekend or at night you’re out of luck. They do not have the super on call 24 hours. They have an office in the building so it’s easy to talk to them during office hours on weekdays but if you don’t work from home that’d be tough to access. I’ve had issues with my boiler/ heating in the winter but each apartment has their own boiler so this will vary by apartment. Heating in the winter costs minimum of $100 in the winter and cooling is typically the same min of $100 in the summer as well. Heat is not included in rent. I have seen roaches in my apartment even tho there is an exterminator that comes monthly and I also spray on top of that on my own. I have also heard a rat in the walls although this happened for the first time within this past year (2021). Update: several tenants upstairs have complained about seeing rats and management has not responded adequately. Overall it’s clear that management doesn’t want to invest in the building. Things could be nicer overall. They could make capital improvements to the apartments but furnishings are from an older style and they try to patch things up instead of replacing re: my boiler and shower head. All of the stoves in this building are small and are slow to turn on so be wary of that.
Advice to owner:
Invest in capital improvements and have a super on call over the weekend and at nights for emergencies.