C

Citi Urban Management Corp

Corporate Owner

3 Properties

25 Units

Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
Review Summary for Citi Urban Management Corp
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Tenant reviews for buildings managed by CITI URBAN MANAGEMENT CORP reveal widespread dissatisfaction with management's responsiveness and maintenance quality. Common issues include persistent pest infestations, neglected repairs (such as faulty gas, water leaks, and mold), and frequent safety hazards. Garbage management and cleanliness are often rated poorly, with several complaints about overflowing trash and unaddressed disruptions. Despite some appreciation for long-term tenants, friendly neighbors, and proximity to transit, the landlord is frequently described as unresponsive, neglectful, and prioritizing rent collection over tenant well-being. Residents advise more timely communication, proactive repairs, and better support for on-site staff to improve living conditions.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
13.6 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
45
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 28, 2025: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling and east wall in the 1st room from east located at apt 3s upper level, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Hazardous
134
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 28, 2025: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the missing escutchcon plate at riser in the 1st room from east located at apt 3s upper level, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
157
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 28, 2025: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective window balance lower sash offset 1 window at south wall in the 2nd room from east located at apt 3s upper level, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
4
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 17, 2025: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
All Properties Associated with Citi Urban Management Corp
Throgs Neck
190 Robinson Ave, The Bronx, NY 10465
Units Floors
0(0)
Upper West Side
698 Amsterdam Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10025
13 Units 5 Floors
2.7(6)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Williamsburg
809 Grand Street, Brooklyn, NY 11211
12 Units 4 Floors
2.7(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No

Reviews (8)

4 months ago
Easily the worst management of all time
Former Tenant
Pros:
good neighbourhood, good super
Cons:
If you value your peace of mind, stay far away from this building and its management.
Nothing about this property is right. From massive rat infestations inside apartments, recurring leaks every time it rains, mold issues, pest problems, filthy hallways, and broken, unsafe staircases — it’s an endless list of neglect. Packages are stolen constantly, and you’re lucky if anything you order actually reaches you. The water quality is horrendous, with murky, discolored tap water that’s a health hazard in itself.
But none of these problems come close to the disaster that is their property management team. They’ll demand full market-rate rent on time like clockwork, but when it comes to fulfilling their actual responsibilities — like fixing a collapsed ceiling caused by their own construction negligence — they will vanish. Emails will be ignored, phone calls passed around, and no one will ever be accountable.
In this building, the burden of every problem will be pushed onto you, no matter how serious or hazardous. It doesn’t matter if it’s a rat crawling across your bedroom, a flooded ceiling, or structural safety hazards — they will find a way to make it your responsibility to fix, while they continue collecting rent.
Living here is a constant fight just to have basic livable conditions. Peace of mind? Forget it.
You’re on your own.
Advice to owner:
give up this business
4 months ago
Good but can be better
Former Tenant
Pros:
We had regular supply of heat and hot water during winters. And the neighbors are pretty cool.
Cons:
Management would take weeks to respond to any issue.
Over 1 year ago
landlord does bare minimum, sometimes not even that
Former Tenant
Pros:
proximity to the subway, live-in super seemed to be a nice person who wanted to make the building better — but was slowed down by landlord's slow responsiveness and failure to regularly reimburse him for supplies
Cons:
huge roaches, landlord special thick paint, scaffolding blocking windows for years. ConEd required them to shut off our cooking gas due to unsafe pipes they hadn't repaired, and it stayed off for 8+ months before we vacated because they didn't make the fixes. They gave us a hot plate instead of being able to use our stove and oven
Over 3 years ago
AVOID AT ALL COSTS
Former Tenant
Pros:
1) Right next to the L
2) Neighbors are very friendly
Cons:
1) Everything else
2) Management is awful theyll block your number if you contact them too many times
3) Don’t expect any maintenance requests to get fulfilled
4) The bugs make my skin crawl
5) Insanely expensive for no reason
6) The garbage overflows and doesn’t get taken care of for days so there’s often garbage thrown all over the entry way and sidewalk
7) This also attracts lots of rats
8) Crazy loud construction that operates at any time of the day and will continue until late 2023
Advice to owner:
They absolutely do not care and will not pay attention to any advice so not going to bother
Over 3 years ago
Good super but no gas
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good area, great bodega downstairs, good super. Cozy apartment for being old.
Cons:
Scaffolding has been up for years, there was no gas in the building when I moved out, and it seemed like they were lying to new tenants about electric stoves being installed. We cooked on hot plates all through the pandemic, and they wouldn't give us (longtime renters!) any discount. Owner wasn’t responsive at all and didn’t treat the super well, who was trying to help tenants and maintain the building.
Advice to owner:
Pay for repairs or cut rent deals with tenants!
Over 3 years ago
Good Location, Bad Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Good location by subway entrance
-Spacious & lots of storage
-Natural sunlight
Cons:
-Management never responds even when there are broken appliances/toilets/heaters
-Garbage is only collected periodically so piles of trash live by the entrance which invites rats
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive and ask residents how to improve building. There are many residents who are loyal and have lived there for 10+ years but get treated like garbage.
Over 4 years ago
A nice apartment in theory but terribly managed
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lots of light, huge living room, close to subway, nice super, big kitchen
Cons:
Completely ghosted by management when asked to fix stuff. We had mice the entire time. Also had bed bugs and had to pay for part of treatment ourselves. Gas was out for 6 months and then we moved so who knows it could even still be out. They gave us hot plates as a replacement and then did electricity repairs so we couldn’t even use them a few days. The trash is around the corner and a pain to get to. Just absolutely terrible management.
Over 4 years ago
Unresponsive landlords
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good sized apartment
Cons:
Multiple building code violations unaddressed for months, mice problems, perpetual scaffolding for year+, no stove or oven, hot water problems.

Landlord does not even have curtesy to respond to emails fix above points.
Advice to owner:
Pick up your phone and answer emails, also fix the building and you won’t have a revolving door of turnover when people move in and immediately break their leases for mold and pests.