D

43 Duffield LLC

Corporate Owner

1 Properties

9 Units

Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
Review Summary for 43 Duffield LLC
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent reviews for buildings managed by 43 DUFFIELD LLC reveal significant management challenges. Tenants value the convenient, quiet location and decent neighbors, but widespread dissatisfaction with maintenance and responsiveness is prevalent. Buildings suffer from poor upkeep, including leaks, water damage, pest issues, and unreliable utilities. Many tenants report slow or nonexistent responses to repair requests, unqualified maintenance personnel, and unsafe conditions such as electrical hazards and construction debris left unattended. Despite some affordable rent and basic amenities like central AC and heat, management is often described as uncommunicative, neglectful, and sometimes disingenuous, making these properties a difficult place to live without improvements in care and professionalism.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
4.33 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
12
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 22, 2025: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling in the 2nd bathroom from east located at apt 2, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
21
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 17, 2025: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective deteriorated grout at east wall in the bathroom located at apt 4, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 02, 2025: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinge in the entrance located at apt 4, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with 43 Duffield LLC
Downtown Brooklyn
43 Duffield Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
9 Units 4 Floors
3(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No

Reviews (5)

3 months ago
Great location management sucks
Former Tenant
Pros:
Look and feel of the building is a huge selling point. So are the central AC units. Street is super quiet and safe and the location makes it easy to get anywhere. Neighbors are OK.
Cons:
Renovations horribly done. Terrible paint jobs, leaks, and signs of water damage. The backyard is absolutely trashed. Management does not respond in a timely manner and they send out the super for any and every issue, even though you clearly need someone who knows more than the super. As to the response they not only take forever to answer but they can’t even be bothered to acknowledge when they receive a work order or email. This has been a huge downside. I’ve lived with buildings for the same price and better management and it makes the world of a difference when they at least pretend to care.
Advice to owner:
Answer your emails
4 months ago
Location but no Maintenance
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location of the apartment is great - close to subways, downtown Brooklyn and Brooklyn heights. Biggest downside with the location is the busy cross street.
Cons:
The apartment was in disrepair. Issues over my 2 years as a tenant ranged from a gas leak to very noticeably slanted floors and doorways. It was the only building on the block where no snow was shoveled from the front steps after heavy snow. I learned after nearly a year that an elderly neighbor (from a different apartment building) was regularly moving the trash cans, sorting recycling and working to maintain the condition around our building because there’s was virtually no work of this kind by the property management
Advice to owner:
Significantly more active property management and maintenance
6 months ago
A mostly good building!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Central air & heat
Affordable
Distance to transit
Cons:
Only one washer & dryer in the basement (and not cheap)
Management can be slow to respond or follow up
The front door digital entry has been broken without getting fixed
Over 1 year ago
terrible building to live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
just in a good area but the building sucks
Cons:
terrible management, place is run down and they put band aids on big issues. place stinks
Over 4 years ago
A complete nightmare
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap, rent stabilized. An adventure. If you're good with legal matters you might be able to make a lot of money suing them.
Cons:
Extremely bad management, maintenance, and condition.

They do extremely superficial maintenance between tenants to get people in there, but it's like they're just plastering over leaks and such. Radiators leak, the roof leaks, plumbing leaks, electricity is unreliable/wet. Multiple tenants have sued. Multiple units had ceilings collapse while I lived there, including in newly "renovated" ones. Toilets leaked. The place is falling apart and isn't safe, it should probably be condemned. I won't be surprised if an electrical fire or gas leak leads to it burning down. They'd probably love for it to be condemned, they've tried to buy-out some of the long-term rent stabilized tenants.

Once you're in there they don't really fix the stuff, but you'll have random unlicensed contractors and handymen in and out constantly to check on things or tweak the fundamentally unsuitable systems to barely keep things going. They can leave water dripping through your apartment for weeks. If they knock a hole in the wall to look for a gas leak or check an electrical wire, they're not going to patch the wall until you move out, and so much is broken they can leave it looking like Swiss cheese. I got mildly electrocuted plenty of times living there and the fire department had to visit too.

Once they suddenly decided to redo the staircase to try to get new tenants. It looks OK now, but during this construction project they left piles of construction rubble on the stairs, nails sticking up, dirt everywhere for weeks. They wouldn't sweep the stairs at the end of a day of work, or even move the construction supplies so we could get up and down the barely-present being-rebuilt stairs.

When maintenance people do show up it's hard to know if you should let them in, since they may just do a bunch of random damage, or there may be a legitimate emergency. They've entered units many times without permission and some tenants changed their locks.

They won't pay for furniture or clothes that will inevitably get destroyed from water and drywall dust, and will still eat your security deposit when you leave. Don't trust their online payment system either, call your bank to preemptively stop-payments in advance when you move out. Assume bad intentions or incompetence in every interaction.

They keep changing the name of the management company to try to hide bad reviews online. The specific issues changed but issues were pretty steady, and there are older reviews. If someone says they're a new owner or new management company of this building, I wouldn't believe them. The building changed hands while I was there and I think it was father to son or something, it seems to be a family business.

Also covid didn't really make a difference and most of our issues were pre covid, but when covid did come the landlord never wore a mask.
Advice to owner:
Stop being a slumlord.