The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.27 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
28
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 29, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at the ceiling in bulkhead, roof , 6th story
Show all
Hazardous
14
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 07, 2023: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove all encumbrances consisting of construction materials at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 26, 2023: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing , 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Murray H Miller Management
East Village
226 East 14 Street, Manhattan, NY 10003
36 Units • 6 Floors
3.1(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (5)
3.88 stars
10 months ago
Amazing location outweighs cons of apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is great, with Trader Joe’s and Target just a few blocks west AND east. Apartment was on ground floor but quiet. Has high ceilings so made space feeler bigger than it was.
Cons:
Appliances were quite old and management can take awhile to respond to maintenance requests. Front door buzzer is broken 75% of the time. Building generally is older.
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Tenement faux bougie
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is everything
Cons:
Packages stolen Shady management Filthy hallways
Advice to owner:
Clean the building
1.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Run down and dirty
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location in the middle of a bustling area
Cons:
Front door never closed , packages stolen , nothing fixed in 2 yrs I lived there , mice , cockroaches , workers on scaffold looking into apt
Advice to owner:
Clean this building and secure it !
4 stars
Over 3 years ago
Ok management in great location
Former Tenant
Pros:
Fantastic location, responsive super, appliances old but in good working condition
Cons:
Head went out for almost a week in the winter with slow response and no rent reduction
Advice to owner:
Lower the rent
3.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
Conveniently located. Neutral about management—I haven’t needed to contact them, and they haven’t bothered me either. Moderately clean for a walk up building, I haven’t had any issues with pests. Pretty quiet, other than the 2 times a year the building behind this one has a college patio party.
Cons:
The walls are decently soundproof but the floor/ceilings aren’t. Very obvious and annoying to be able to hear what the upstairs neighbours are doing. The building has a package theft problem, pretty consistently. Kitchen doesn’t have a range top so you can’t cook much without the whole apartment getting smelly/smoky.