Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.23 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 29, 2015: section 27-2026 adm code repair the leaky and/or defective faucets at shower mixer in the bathroom located at apt 3d, 3rd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 28, 2025: § 27-2045(b)(1)(b) hmc, § 12-06, § 12-07, § 12-09 rcny repair, replace or provide an approved and operational carbon monoxide detecting device, installed in accordance with applicable law and rules missing in the entire apartment located at apt 7b, 7th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 28, 2025: § 27-2005 adm code & 309 m/d law abate the nuisance consisting of scalding hot water above 130 degrees in the entire apartment located at apt 7b, 7th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Moises Farhat
/-73.993922,40.723848,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Nolita
259 Elizabeth Street, Manhattan, NY 10012
26 Units • 7 Floors
4.3(4)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (4)
3.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Good place to live could be better maintained
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great value, great location very quiet. Management was responsive if not always the most helpful
Cons:
Management company was very responsive to small issues…ie. Broken appliances, water pressure etc but less so on larger issues. We had a problem with a leaky roof that was never fixed. Overall good experience and our security deposit was promptly returned when we left.
5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great place overall
Former Tenant
Pros:
Condo so each unit is independently managed. The door man is great and handles our trash. The building is clean and well run, not perfect but no complaints
Cons:
They turn off the water pretty often to do maintenance on the water tank. The dryers in the basement don’t work well
4.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great apartment, for a price
Former Tenant
Pros:
responsive management, clean apartment, amazing neighborhood. a full half of a room dedicated to storage which is awesome, the best oven ive ever had in my life
Cons:
the two upstairs rooms are barely rooms. (the one with bookshelves is a study so no heat and no ac), and in the other you can hear everything on both sides (no privacy). fee is like extremely expensive, but you knew that - so for two of the three people ur paying a luxury apartment level price for barely a room but an amazing apartment overall.
Advice to owner:
Not much they can do - except add heat to that study they call the third bedroom!
4 stars
Over 4 years ago
Water issues and bandaid fixes
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice doorman, cool solariums
Cons:
Slow response to issues, flooding in patio
but no willingness to fix, leaking from ceiling while raining but landlord just paints over the leak
but no willingness to fix, leaking from ceiling while raining but landlord just paints over the leak