Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.15 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 29, 2018: § 300 m/d law file plans and application and legalize the following alteration or restore to the legal condition existing prior to the making of said alteration wood paneling installed at all walls in the 5th room from north located at apt 21, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
13
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 13, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes flower pots at 12th stair tread from bottom at balcony at building front at fire escape, 4th story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 06, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at storage room door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Adam Reisman
3.3(5)
Officer•
2 Properties•42 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
M
207 Madison Owners LLC
3.3(5)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•67 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
J
Joshua Landau
3.4(18)
Head Officer•
4 Properties•47 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Marildo Kapidana
3.3(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•20 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
4 stars
2 months ago
Good value and convenient location
Former Tenant
Pros:
Price point is reasonable and apartment has recent updates. Close to subway. Walking distance to Trader Joe's and Target.
Cons:
Stairs and hallways aren't the cleanest.
Advice to owner:
Deep clean the stairs and 1st floor by mailbox area.
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Stairway to hell
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to subway (not the vibe after dark)
Cons:
So many cons. Mice. Mice in my bed… and we kept it as clean as possible. Oven never worked, place was sooo small, bedrooms could basically only fit a bed, so many stairs, water would stop, idk just ugh. Roof top access shoumd have been illegal
Advice to owner:
Do better maybe
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
It's Okay
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is great. The units get a lot of sunlight. Windows on both sides of the apartment let a lot of light and breeze in. Updated/remodeled kitchen.
Cons:
The bathroom is very old and disgusting. You aren't given proper front door keys and have to rely on a call box. The "amenities" that are advertised, tenants are never given access to. (The basement/courtyard area.) The stretch the super too thin, he's in charge of way too many properties to be effective, Serious rent hikes at the end of your lease term. Additionally, They have clearly divided the unit from the original floorpan, (to accommodate more tenants) resulting in a somewhat bizarre floorpan.
Advice to owner:
Offer tenants access to the amenities they were initially promised, and don't raise the rent so drastically with out following it up with an increase in quality.
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Unfortunate Experience in LES.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location. Location. Location.
Cons:
Common areas, such as basement and courtyard, are not really available to tenants as promised. Hallways and stairwells are not regularly cleaned. Expect exponential rent hikes (about 85% rent increases). Yes, you read that right.
Advice to owner:
Most windows are broken. Not all heat radiators work appropriately. Electrical wiring is outdated and often leads to power outages, especially during heat waves where more than one a/c unit needs to be used for a 1+ bedroom apt.
3.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Cute but Flawed
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cute apartment. Remodeled kitchen and bathroom. No roaches or mice. Great, fun location.
Cons:
The apartment gets hot in the summer! Numerous power outages in the summer. 2 ACs for 2 bedrooms were too much for our electricity to handle. Had to wait for the super to come turn the power on. Our windows don’t stay open without being propped up and can easily fall out of the frame. Reported to super (who is not consistently responsive) multiple times and still not fixed. Residents don’t have access to the basement or outdoor space as advertised. The fridge has drainage issues.