Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent reviews of 69 1st Avenue reveal ongoing issues such as poor cleanliness, inadequate pest control, and maintenance neglect. Despite a convenient location and quiet neighbors in some cases, residentsface challenges like rent hikes, pest problems, and outdated amenities. The management's lack of responsiveness and subpar upkeep contribute to a less-than-ideal living experience. Suggestions include upgrading windows, prioritizing cleanliness, and hiring better contractors for renovations. Overall, the building falls short of justifying its market value due to its aging infrastructure and inconsistent services, making it a less recommended option for prospective tenants.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.52 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit at 69 1 Avenue is better than the city.
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 31, 2018: § 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation the radiator in the 3rd room from north located at apt 5, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 31, 2018: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective caulking at shower base in the bathroom located at apt 5, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 10, 2021: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 5, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Mads Limited Liability Company
2.5(4)
Owner•
1 Property•19 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
M
Mads, LLC
2.5(4)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•43 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Charles Carroll
2.5(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•19 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
E
175-177 East Third Associates LP
3.7(56)
Corporate Owner•
27 Properties•466 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 8
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Filled with roaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cannot hear neighbors, great location, friendly super
Cons:
Rent goes up significantly each year (approx 20%), tons of roaches, had bedbugs in 2019
2.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
No real maintenance
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighborhood is great.
Cons:
Prohibited from cleaning outside of windows in lease but they haven’t been cleaned in years, the hallways are almost never cleaned and even then just a quick sweep, no particular amenities to make this building worth it in any way. They leave graffiti and bird poop all over the front until a couple days before they expect to list an apartment. The doors often have gaps and so you can hear all the hallway noises. They use the same description for every apartment in the building when listing. Any work they did was cheaply done and often used incorrect materials (like the wrong caulking). The staircases and outcroppings on the walls have years worth of dust built up.
Advice to owner:
Pay a service to clean the place once in a while so it looks bare minimum presentable.
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Okay bldg, not worth market value
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are long term, always feels safe in that way. It’s not overly noisy and decent location. Some apartments get great light.
Cons:
The bldg is old and dirty, windows are old and drafty, heat is intermittent, lately the water temperature varies a lot and pressure has always been bad. Overall some of the renovations done over the years were clearly slapped together. Issues tend to take a long time to be fixed.
Advice to owner:
Replace the old windows, clean them once in a while, get a service in to clean the whole hallway once in a while as there are years-old layers of dust. Don’t have the same contractors work on things that did in the past.
2.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Poorly maintained building
Former Tenant
Pros:
location and layout
Cons:
management company is awful
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here