77 St Marks Place,
Manhattan, NY 10003

9 Units

Built in 1900

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Available Listings In 77 St Marks Place
no-listing
Don't miss out on any new listings!
Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
30 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 2 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.55 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 20, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... approx 6 sq ft at ceiling in the 1st room from north located at apt 3c, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
6
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 20, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at north wall in the 1st room from north located at apt 3c, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Feb 20, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinge in the entrance located at apt 3c, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
Living Space LLC
2.2(16)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties19 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
R Chou
2.2(16)
Agent
Site Manager
Head Officer
Shareholder
Officer
2 Properties19 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
Ripel LLC
2.2(16)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties19 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Water Pressure
Cleanliness
Pest Control
Heat
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Neighbors
Garbage Management

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (16)

4 weeks ago
Not worth it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is good
Cons:
Poor and unresponsive management, Overpriced, Penny-pinching landlord, Mice and pigeons, Package stealing, Dirty
2 months ago
Great location, standard sized apartment for the east village
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rooms have large closets and the location is great
Cons:
If you like having an accessible landlord this is not the place for you
Advice to owner:
Provide more prompt responses to tenant concerns
4 months ago
DO NOT LIVE HERE
Former Tenant
Pros:
location, size of unit
Cons:
this landlord is the biggest crook to ever grace the east village. good luck ever getting a prompt response from her, actually fixing maintenance issues (not just a bandaid solution), getting a digital copy of your lease (she will charge you $50 for one), consistent working heat, leaking ceilings, and general compassion and kindness. rita chou is the sole "employee" of ripel llc and will never give you a phone number to contact her (email only). when she does call you unannounced its from a blocked number so you cannot call her back. I implore you to not live her.
Advice to owner:
find a soul
7 months ago
77 Saint Marks
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location rooms are fairly big for NYC
Cons:
Management is not super responsive. Sometimes it takes them a bit to respond to emails. No laundry in the building.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive to your tenants
8 months ago
A few years ago...
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building was well maintained, structurally sound had good water pressure.
Cons:
Packages were constantly stolen from downstairs. Neighbors were polite but very noisy. Bugs and mice were constant problems.
9 months ago
Okay place to live , not entirely perfect through
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location, and the building is generally well maintained.
Cons:
Somewhat Expensive, but otherwise not too bad overall
Advice to owner:
N/A
11 months ago
Management is TERRIBLE
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is prime. The building itself is so-so; common areas really would benefit from a facelift (paint in the halls is mismatched/scuffed/patched, floor tiles are cracked in a few places). Apartments are small for the price, but get the job done.
Cons:
Where do I even begin? Management is a nightmare. Rita I concerned about one thing only, and that’s collecting what she feels she is owed. There is no leniency, no flexibility, no courtesy, and no help - if you’re asking for something above the bare minimum required of her, expect a no (often in an exceedingly condescending manner). Want to find out your landlord’s name? Look at the building’s tax docs (she never tells you!) Want to contact Rita with an emergency? Email only - you will never be given a phone number to contact!! Email replies come quickly, but are often condescending, with solutions happening on management’s timeline, which prioritizes cost over efficiency and convenience. Rita will hide behind the lease, quoting it back to you at all opportunities, but then become aggressive when you begin to quote the lease back at her. The nearly 20-page agreement is loaded with extraneous fees for non-standard violations, and you better believe she’ll charge you for any and all of them with no warnings. Rita is obviously overwhelmed as the sole manager of this building and another in Manhattan, which is almost funny as she frequently refers to a collective “we” for management decisions. She enforced a strict double standards where she can make mistakes, but you cannot. Aside from management, during the year I spent in this building, we required direct action from management/maintenance staff on at least 4 separate occasions. This is outside of repairs we did ourselves (as outlined in the lease, there is a fee for unnecessary maintenance calls) and monthly exterminator visits (no roaches at the time, but we had mice when we moved in). Fixes seem like bandaids rather than proactive solutions, so expect appliances to break down during your lease. You may be thinking your experience will be different, like I did when I signed my lease, but I promise you things will not change. Avoid living in either of the two buildings owned by Rita, Ripel LLC, and Living Spaces LLC (or whatever she renames the LLC to when you’re reading this). It’s not worth the headache or the arm and a leg they’ll charge for rent and added fees.
Advice to owner:
Consider a respectful relationship with tenants instead of approaching with legalese, condescension, and fines. A management company or additional staff will also help with the fact that you’re obviously overwhelmed by what appears to be a fairly straightforward operation.
Over 1 year ago
Avoid this place at alllll costs
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is great
Cons:
The trash bins where tenants take their unit garbage is located half a set of stairs below the entry- no door, no lids on the bins even, nothing. So of course there will be an awful smell and cockroaches and mice roaming around. When I lived here, as soon as we moved in all gas was cut off to all units. Meaning we were unable to use our stove or ovens. This went on for 10/12 months of the lease. NO rent reduction or reimbursement or anything, just rude responses basically saying “that’s too bad”. Gave us a single-burner portable stove to plug in. Which of course will increase electricity bill but obviously no help there either. Upon lease ending, landlord said we must return them cleaned spotless and in original packaging or we would be charged $60 (they were $30 on Amazon when we checked). When moving in made sure to take photos of ALL the dents, scratches, dirty un cleaned oven, etc. When landlord inspected apartment to move out, tried to say we caused the damage. We sent time-stamped photos from when we moved in. Response was “you could have easily edited those photos”- what!?!? Also had a mouse in the apartment and not to get into it but you can probably guess by now just how helpful the landlord was. Two front doors, first one is not locked. Had people sleeping in that vestibule. Door lost its doorknob at one point at took about a week to get it replaced not with tape the tenants use to try and even access their home.
Advice to owner:
Try acting like a human being and realize that real people live here, it’s not just a passive income property that you can ignore.
Over 1 year ago
AVOID! Overpriced and terribly managed
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location + terraces
Cons:
Living here was never a pleasant experience. Gas was not working. Bedroom doors to terrace do not seal. Very tiny 2bd apt. Garbage management in the basement is appalling - rodents crawl in and out of bins. Upon leaving, management illegally withheld portions of security deposit for frivolous things like: - not replacing batteries in smoke detector - not cleaning filter in window ac unit before leaving unit - management’s convenience fee for depositing the security deposit in an interest-bearing savings account far exceeded the amount of interest earned - the list goes on We went to small claims court to dispute these charges and, 2 years later, we settled to get some of it returned. Renter beware.
Over 1 year ago
DO NOT RENT HERE!!!
Former Tenant
Pros:
the neighbours were okay
Cons:
Dealing with this landlord has been a horrible experience (Rita Chou/Ripel LLC). She has no regard for tenants or cleanliness of the building and has a very accusatory attitude for someone who has not even provided a habitable apartment for us to live in (by NYC code/legal standards). She painted over black mould in our bathtub prior to move in that ate through the paint in days. When we asked her to remove it she did not. During move in the apartment was still being painted. When we complained about fumes she said that we just had to deal with it. Rats in the basement, refusal to cooperate and charging us an excessive amount from our security deposit for nothing. She even charged us from the security deposit money for finishing the move 3 minutes (and yes we have this on the record) after the final time she gave us -- during the height of the pandemic so that should tell you how she is. No gas for 6 months and while we were provided a hot plate, there was no urgency on her end to reinstate gas. Rats in the basement, mold, gas issues, disrespectful behaviour to tenants depending on her mood, I could go on. Tenants - don't be afraid to call 311 if you need to. Stay far away from here.
Advice to owner:
Treat tenants with respect and don't paint over mold
Over 2 years ago
Renter Be Ware
Former Tenant
Pros:
Strong water pressure, good hot and cold water Great location Strong Heat
Cons:
Deceptive Management Personnel (Rita C.) and Management Practices Poor communication from management Inflexible Management Infestation (cockroaches and rodents spotted once a month on average for a 12month lease) Lack of Kitchen Storage Uneven floors Thin walls (can hear normal conversations from neighbor) Small space (436 sqft) No active/working kitchen vents No active/working Bathroom Vents Shower Controls very temperamental (shifts from very hot to very cold instantly) Heater controls do not work properly
Advice to owner:
Fire your head officer (Rita Chou), redefine what kind of manager you want to be Take a more tenant-centric approach and it will payoff in the long run
Over 2 years ago
Don’t live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful terrace in Apt 4B
Cons:
Mice in apartment, landlord is terrible, unresponsive, not helpful, and incredibly rude.
Advice to owner:
I would advise against living her simply because landlord is so terrible and the mice problem is bad.
Over 2 years ago
NYU Dorm Quality
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, some apartments have outdoor space
Cons:
Had mouse issues - need to get a rodent control company to ensure your apartment is sealed. There is an exterminator once a month that comes by. Garbage is collected in basement but there's a frequent smell of garbage. The contact you have with the property owner is limited to email, with varying responsiveness, and often met with rude or curt responses.
Advice to owner:
Provide contact information for maintenance in case of off-hours issues.
Over 2 years ago
Horrible landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
In the middle of saint marks
Cons:
Loud at night because of the bar downstairs, walls are super thin, during the winter the heater does not work properly, and huge cockroaches
Advice to owner:
Have better communication skills
Over 2 years ago
would not recommend unless a student at nyu
Former Tenant
Pros:
inexpensive apartment and right in the middle of the east village
Cons:
noisy, hallways smell like trash kept at bottom of stairs, landlord nickel and dimes you on exit, landlord does not make amenable maintenance repair requests
Advice to owner:
please treat yourself tenants with some level of human decency
Over 2 years ago
Only good thing is the location
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location on St Mark's
Cons:
Oven didn't work for 6 months with no rent decrease; workmen are the landlords family rather than professionals; cockroaches and mice throughout the building; landlord is extremely inflexible; homeless people sleep in the vestibule
Advice to owner:
Stop assuming the worst in your tenants; lock the front door of the building
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here