Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Tenant reviews of 95 Lexington Avenue reveal a mixed experience. Positives include a central Manhattan location, spacious apartments, and some responsive management staff and supers. Many appreciate laundry facilities and good water pressure. However, several renters highlight ongoing issues such as poor management responsiveness, neglected maintenance—especially of laundry rooms—and persistent problems with cleanliness, pest control, and security concerns like package theft and homeless presence in common areas. Noise and problematic neighbors are frequently mentioned, along with dissatisfaction over rent hikes and controversial renovations that detract from the building’s prewar charm. These contrasts suggest renting here suits those valuing location while willing to tolerate management shortcomings.
Reviews (7)
4.25 stars
2 months ago
No major issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good management, responsive super.
Cons:
Laundry room broken most of the time. Packages get stolen.
2 stars
Over 1 year ago
Could be better but management is negligent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry in the building
Cons:
Douglas Elliman management provides the minimal amount of effort to help with complaints
Advice to owner:
Please pick up the phone when a tenant calls or return an email
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It dummy text been reported if this building dummy electronic rent payments.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit at 95 Lexington Avenue is better than the city.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.06 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Mar 12, 2018: § 27-2045 adm code post a proper notice of smoke detector requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, at or near the mail box missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 06, 2017: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code fire egress defective. remove obstructing bars or unlawful gates from window to fire escape or provide approved type gate ... in the kitchen located at apt 4n, 4th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
D
David Mandracchia
3(7)
Joint Owner•
1 Property•77 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
A
Alan Nagel
3(7)
Joint Owner•
1 Property•77 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
N
Nagel Partners, LP
3(7)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•77 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
D
Douglas Elliman Property Management
4.2(218)
Corporate Owner•
503 Properties•39829 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 369
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Frequently Asked Questions
Unlock insights about this building
OR
Review your building to unlock access to tenant reviews OR purchase access to unlock insights about violations, complaints, infestations, and more.