200 West 94 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

14 Units

Built in 1900

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Review Summary for 200 West 94 Street
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews for 200 West 94th Street highlight severe issues such as poor management, lack of essential services like heat and water, rodent infestations, and unresponsive owners. Pros include a responsive super and the location's convenience. Most reviewers advise against living there due to neglect, unpleasant odors, and persistent pest problems. Management's indifference, rude treatment of staff, and unaddressed maintenance concerns contribute to a negative living experience. Despite a few positives like a friendly super and location, the overall consensus is to avoid this building due to significant drawbacks and poor living conditions.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
11.85 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit at 200 West 94 Street is worse than the city .
flag
Non-hazardous
18
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 23, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling at public hall, 5th story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
90
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 25, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling and all walls in the bathroom located at apt 2e, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
57
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jan 13, 2025: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 3e, 3rd story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Feb 01, 2016: §27-2153 adm code the premises has been selected to participate in the alternative enforcement program which may result in building-wide inspections, fees, and extensive repair work to correct violations and underlying conditions. charges for repair work done pursuant to this order, if not paid, will become liens on the property
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
C
Citi Urban Mgmt Corp
2.9(66)
Agent
17 Properties332 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 7
E
Eric Borkowski
3.2(89)
Head Officer
42 Properties497 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
L
Lukasz Stapor
2.1(9)
Officer
2 Properties44 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
I
Ivan Disla
2.9(8)
Head Officer
3 Properties22 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (6)

9 months ago
Do not live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
There is nothing good to say about this building
Cons:
Living here made my life a living hell. The people who work at citi urban management are criminal. I had no heat or hot water for months, a horrible rat infestation, sewage leaks through our electrical system, neighbors blasting music at all hours of the day, management is incredibly rude and unresponsive, and the super doesn’t do anything. Please do not consider living here!!
Over 1 year ago
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE
Former Tenant
Pros:
this building sucks. NOTHING good about it.
Cons:
No super. no heat. no water pressure. rodent infestation. DO NOT LIVE HERE!!!
Advice to owner:
Let entire building out of their leases.
Over 1 year ago
wonderful super and location, TERRIBLE everything
Former Tenant
Pros:
-very kind, responsive super
-cheap covid rent at the time of occupancy
-location
Cons:
-management (unresponsive/indifferent to serious issues)
-rats!
-terrible TERRIBLE smell
-front door was unlocked for over a month
-building in total disrepair due to lack of regard for the building/protecting the tenants
-building manager treated the super terribly, gave no support for addressing the aforementioned issues
Advice to owner:
not cool, bro
Over 2 years ago
Ouch
Former Tenant
Pros:
The super (Felipe) is great. The carson door bell is nice and being able to unlock the front door and package room via the app. The location is also excellent- right on Amsterdam, close to Trader Joe’s and less than a minute from 96th station.
Cons:
It’s so dirty! There is a long time tenant on the fifth floor who makes other residents uncomfortable and leaves perishable food out that brings pests into the apartment and the smell is awful. Package and front (!!) door on multiple occasions I’ve found unlocked. Landlords are inaccessible and do not respond.
Over 2 years ago
It smells in here
Former Tenant
Pros:
The super is very sweet and attentive
Cons:
There is a hoarder who lives on the 5th floor. He collects rotting food that sits in the hallway and attracts pests. During warm days and summer months, the stairwell smells horrible.
Over 2 years ago
Just don’t
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartments were decently sized and the super is very responsive
Cons:
Management will not respond to any communication. Other tenant will leave trash, food, waste, etc in hallways which attracts pests. Scaffolding is never coming down.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here