340 East 52 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10022

65 Units

Built in 1941

9 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
lock
Once you submit an anonymous review for this building (or any other) you will gain access to the entire openigloo platform

Renters Recommendations

-- of renters recommend this building

-- of renters approve of this owner
Review Summary for 340 East 52 Street
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent reviews of 340 East 52 Street spotlight benefits such as a prime Manhattan location, quiet units especially those facing the back, friendly doormen, and generally amicable neighbors. Tenants have praised the building's cleanliness in several instances and noted effective pest control and heating systems. However, significant concerns relate to management responsiveness, with reports of slow or inadequate maintenance responses, unresolved electrical and water issues, and ongoing construction disruptions. Some tenants raised safety worries about the quality of renovations and electrical work. Garbage management and water pressure also received mixed feedback, with some suggesting improvements. Potential renters should weigh these factors for a balanced perspective.

Reviews (4)

1 month ago
Quiet and Convenient
Former Tenant
Pros:
Friendly doormen, great location, unit facing the back is quiet
Cons:
Unit facing the back is dark, garbage rooms are not cleaned regularly enough
6 months ago
Make up facade, to hide serious hazard - including electrical mayhem
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is great, most neighbors friendly, and the doormen team quite helpful.
Cons:
I moved to this apartment believing this was a newly renovated building, securing my apartment while some construction was still in place under the premise that there was nothing on the same level under the price range, pushed to secure this unit before was too late. Did not took long for the issues begin, as my bathroom had a strange leak that made no sense, considering the complex revamp this building went through. I had a friend that used to live in this location prior the renovation --that was forced to leave the building once the new owner was ready to change everything-- So I can say as a fact that the changes on each apartment was structural, revamping the set up of almost every apartment, what I saw as a great improvement, but getting puzzled with this leak, because it became a serious issue in a short period of time, while doesn't appear to have any connection with the units above my apartment. I contacted the management several times, being treated as a crazy women, taking almost two months to have someone coming to fix the problem - without sharing what really was the cause of this problem. Not much later, I started to have some issues with the electrical, as out of blue some outlets became irresponsive, and resuming the work without any logical reason, what at first I believe could be related to the work that was still In place for the building. By chance, an electrician friend was visiting me one time when this issue happened, so he offered to take a look on the fuse box. He was shocked with the state the electrical was set on my apartment, as he defined the work as a chaotic time bomb that could be triggered at any moment, Wasn't only a matter of the setup that did not followed the code, but he noticed more than one hot wire connected to the box but without being placed on outlets, or anything, being left hanging inside the wall. That was when I started looking for the permits taken for this renovation - better saying the lack of permits held during the entire process, as the permit granted for the work executed on this building promoted only cosmetic restoration of apartments, instead the complete revamp that really took place. This finding made me scared of continue living in this premise, as I became aware that other tenants had similar problems, promoting this was generalized hazard. For my surprise, the management company was aware of the issues but had no interest fixing the problem. Recently I bumped into one of my previous neighbors, and he mentioned that the building seems to have frequent inspections on the electrical by the city - and failing on every visit - making this whole case and astonishing evidence of the disrespect tenants face in this city, independent of the abusive cost of securing a home.
Advice to owner:
After everything I experienced and found about this building my question is if this is a matter being cheap and disregarding the risks involved to the hazard condition you held your tenants, or if the is actually some kind of strategy to benefit from chaos on some really dark way.

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It dummy text been reported if this building dummy electronic rent payments.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit at 340 East 52 Street is better than the city.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 06, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at east and south wall at public hall stairs, 4th story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
C
CREFMA1 340 East 52ND Owner LLC
3.3(4)
Corporate Owner
1 Property65 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
D
Daniel Hochberg
3.3(4)
Head Officer
1 Property65 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
A
Arben Latifi
3.3(4)
Site Manager
1 Property65 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
M
Mgt Ues Property Management LLC
3.6(6)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties155 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!
Frequently Asked Questions
Unlock insights about this building
Review your building to unlock access to tenant reviews OR purchase access to unlock insights about violations, complaints, infestations, and more.
Already have an account?Login Here