420 East 80 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10075

156 Units

Built in 1961

13 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Evictions: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Available Listings In 420 East 80 Street
unit
Upper East Side
420 East 80 Street #PENTHOUSEAB
$15,950
3 beds3 bathsEst. Jun 2024
Future
unit
Upper East Side
420 East 80 Street #7F
$4,902
1 bed1 bathEst. Oct 2024
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
74 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 18 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.03 violation per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 01, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 29, 2021: section 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 15, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Saul Friedman
3.9(7)
Head Officer
9 Properties572 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 7
E
420 E 80th LLC
3.9(6)
Agent
1 Property156 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
T
Tomas Rosenthal
3.9(6)
Head Officer
2 Properties204 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
F
Frank Dzaferi
3.9(6)
Site Manager
1 Property156 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Water Pressure
Cleanliness
Pest Control
Heat
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Neighbors
Garbage Management

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (6)

Over 1 year ago
Avoid avoid avoid
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen are awesome. Neighborhood is good.
Cons:
Management is awful. They'll nickel and dime you for more money whenever they can.
Advice to owner:
Don't ignore requests of your tenants
Over 1 year ago
Bare minimum doorman elevator building.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doorman Elevator building with nice lobby and good laundry.
Cons:
Management is non responsive for the most part and they don’t really care about the tenants just want to make money. Must be very low maintenance to live in this building for the price. Basically the cheapest doorman elevator building you’re going to find and they act like it.
Advice to owner:
Care more about existing tenants that have lived in your building for 5+ years.
Over 1 year ago
Good, quiet UES place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice doormen, two elevators, safe area, laundry in building and plenty of machines, good noise level
Cons:
A bit of a further walk from trains, about 10-15 min
Over 2 years ago
Needs to be proactive
Former Tenant
Pros:
The rent and the view
Cons:
Replaced doorman staff w security staff, Understaffed when things need to be fixed
Over 2 years ago
No significant issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
It’s a well maintained building with a responsive super. never had an issue that wasn’t addressed in a timely manner.
Cons:
A bit overpriced for why you get. A lot of the apartments are large, but aren’t updated (kitchen/bathroom) and paint is sloppily applied between tenants. Paying a luxury price without really offering the qualities or amenities to back it up.
Advice to owner:
Do more to keep current tenants in terms of price flexibility or honor promotional pricing. Negotiating with the management once already a tenant has been a dead end...even during the pandemic.
Over 2 years ago
Quiet, safe neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, doorman building. Can’t hear neighbors through concrete walls
Cons:
Sound travels through bathroom vents. Laundry in basement expensive.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here