107-25 East 107 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10029

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Yes
Available Listings In 107-25 East 107 Street
no-listing
Don't miss out on any new listings!
Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
658 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 2 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 10, 2023: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling at public hall, 15th story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
9
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 23, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling and all walls in the 1st living room from north located at apt w816, 8th story, 7th apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
9
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 07, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... at ceiling approx. 10sq.ft in the bathroom located at apt 1016, 10th story, 6th apartment from south at west original violation 15963570 issued 06-may-23 has been upgraded to class c per administrative code §27-2017.3a(5)(a) or (b).
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Water Pressure
Cleanliness
Pest Control
Heat
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Neighbors
Garbage Management

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

6 months ago
The Carolina in East Harlem
Former Tenant
Pros:
It’s In Manhattan
Cons:
Manhattan North Management Company manages the building but they don’t care. They don’t keep the building clean there’s roaches all over & the laundry room washers & dryers & card machines steals your money. The money card in the lobby steals residents money without credit the money to the $10 card you had to purchase. The walls & ceilings are thin. You can hear your neighbors upstairs walking and if they have children or a house full it sounds like a herd of horses are walking on your head. The paint on the walls is cheap & you have to wait 3 years for paint job. There’s been four managers in three years & four super’s in three years. The turnover rate is high with this company, because the staff are under paid and overworked. The Management team doesn’t really care & has absolutely no control. The owners of Manhattan North Management is Tahl Propp Equities a multi million dollar company that owns several affordable real estate properties in New York City. They owns 16 affordable housing complexes, 16 condominiums, several corporate real estate tenancies and more. They’re still building more affordable housing units to neglect. It’s what you’d call a slumlord. This company obviously takes from the poor to keep the rich rich because they use government subsidies to make millions of dollars to file tax credits to place low income, poor people in cheaply made apartments & buildings and then once the person is in their apartment, they don’t care about the upkeep of the apartment or the maintenance of building. The only time the super has the porters clean correctly is when the government does an inspection because the HPD informs the manager of the visits in advance allowing the owner to clean the building for the inspection. Another Prime example of learning how to take advantage of the system. This company has learned how to take advantage of New York City’s, horrible real estate system and the people who suffer are the tenants.
Advice to owner:
The owners need to have consideration for the tenants that live in their buildings. They need to keep the buildings clean and functioning the environment inside and outside. The buildings should be top notch but they are neglected by the employees who work there and the managers don’t enforce the rules. There’s no smoking but there’s smoking. It’s supposed to be service pets only and everyone has a dog. If a resident has an issue management needs to solve that issue, if a resident is owed money because of their bad and faulty washers, dryer and laundry card machines that tenant needs to have his money returned to him. Hire people with experience that I actually care about the environment they work in. Management, the super, the porters, and maintenance men should know what they’re doing but they’re lazy and care. If you own a property with 400 units in it make the trash room & the receptacles need to be big enough to hold the garbage. You need more than three porters in a 400 apartments. It’s unacceptable. Don’t put carpet down in high-volume traffic if you can’t have it vacuum one a week and cleaned at least 4 times a years. Buildings carpet gets dirty fast and then it makes the environment unsanitary & creates roaches. The complaint with this property goes on and on. The owners who agreed on the design this building did not think it through. Especially, when they decided to just place any and everyone in this building without doing background checks , without doing credit checks etc. etc. The a/c - heating unit are loud and don’t work correctly and the maintenance man doesn’t know how to fix it. Did I mention you have to pay for electricity. Also, when you hire weak staff and managers who don’t care it shows in the employees because if the manager doesn’t care, why would the Porter or Super or the maintenance man care. The owners of Manhattan North Management Company need to do better. Tahl Propp equities need to do better because they are know considered to be know as another slum landlord in New York City.
Over 1 year ago
I have been lived here since 2 years now
Former Tenant
Pros:
Staff who work in the building are nice, work hard. The building is a brand new. No pest issues
Cons:
Some tenants are nasty. They threw garbage out of the window and use the laundry room dirty although staffs are clean every day.
Over 1 year ago
Bad management communication
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is beautiful on the outside. Great curb appeal. Nice outdoor inner outdoor spaces. Nice laundry room. Great views of surrounding area.
Cons:
No security. The gym had a lock now there is no safety lock for key fab anyone can walk in. Residents that don’t live in the building use facility. Management has poor communication they don’t make tenants adhere to noise compliance. Music is allowed to blast duration from midnight until early morning and you get penalized for raising awareness. If you react you suffer consequences of standing up for what’s already in terms of the lease
Advice to owner:
Make clear terms in lease. Contact tenants back or don’t make your management abs or staff numbers available.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here