62 Patchen Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11221

8 Units

Built in 1931

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
lock
Once you submit an anonymous review for this building (or any other) you will gain access to the entire openigloo platform

Renters Recommendations

-- of renters recommend this building

-- of renters approve of this owner
Review Summary for 62 Patchen Avenue
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews for 62 Patchen Avenue in Brooklyn, NY highlight significant issues with the landlord's responsiveness, poor maintenance, and pest control problems. Tenants express frustration with delayed repairs, cheaply done fixes, and recurring issues like mold infestation and rodent problems. Despite decent apartment sizes and proximity to amenities, the lack of landlord care and communication hinders the overall living experience. Suggestions include investing in professional maintenance, improving communication, and addressing long-standing building concerns promptly. Overall, tenants caution that the building's condition and management may not meet expectations, urging potential renters to carefully consider these factors.

Reviews (5)

Over 1 year ago
Proceed at your own risk
Former Tenant
Pros:
The rent isn’t as bad as everywhere else
Cons:
Landlord puts a bandaid on severe issues and never ever, I mean ever fixes anything. He refuses to hire anyone to do the actual work and attempts and fails at everything.
Advice to owner:
Hire someone to manage the property
Over 4 years ago
I only stay for the amount of space
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apt is a good size and the location is nice for walking access to both Bushwick and Bed Stuy, and multiple bus and train options to the rest of Brooklyn and the city. Neighbors have historically been friendly but multiple units are empty now. Rent for new tenants is reasonable again, after being high for a few years. I would only recommend to a friend if they were handy and able to take care of things themselves and they needed the space for the price, which is a decent deal for the area, although high for the quality.
Cons:
The layout is awkward, one huge bedroom, one large bedroom (but it’s the connector from the huge bedroom to the rest of the apartment, huge bedroom has a separate entrance so often the folks in that room have to exit the apt and re-enter down the hall for the kitchen, bathroom, living room), one very small bedroom.

Living room and kitchen are small. Appliances are second hand. Flooring is very cheap, tiles break, laminate is uneven and breaks or nails come up to snag or stab you. Leaks are common and reoccurring. There have been mold issues. Repairs are done by the landlord and not well done. Lacks adequate smoke alarms. Doors swell and locks don’t work or stick frequently. Exterminator comes erratically and with no notice so sometimes no one is home to let them in.

Landlord very rude over text and phone, blames tenant for any issues with the apartment, even obviously externally caused problems. Bad mouths tenants to each other expecting sympathy.

Landlord did not offer flexible payments due to covid hardship and was not open to negotiations with a group of tenants together, but did ultimately agree to some discounts to back rent for tenants on a per apartment basis. Multiple tenants moved out.
Advice to owner:
Work on your communication skills and your empathy, treat your tenants like you would like to be treated. Take care of your building and invest in maintaining and improving it instead of spending the least possible and doing the least.

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It dummy text been reported if this building dummy electronic rent payments.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 7 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit at 62 Patchen Avenue is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.75 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
6
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 10, 2025: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 18, 2025: § 27-2045(b)(1)(b) hmc, § 12-06, § 12-07, § 12-09 rcny repair, replace or provide an approved and operational carbon monoxide detecting device, installed in accordance with applicable law and rules defective in the entire apartment located at apt 4l, 4th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 18, 2025: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing info at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Ahzad Ali
1.6(5)
2 Properties14 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!
Frequently Asked Questions
Unlock insights about this building
Review your building to unlock access to tenant reviews OR purchase access to unlock insights about violations, complaints, infestations, and more.
Already have an account?Login Here