Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.33 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2021: section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the 5th room from east, the private hallway located at apt 1r, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
11
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 17, 2023: § 27-2005, 2006, 2037 hmc: properly repair and abate unsafe electric wiring condition consisting of exposed wires at ceiling at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 17, 2023: § 27-2044, 2041.1 hmc: §238 mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing the doors that is missing or defective vestibule door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Ahmad Khan
1.3(2)
Site Manager•
Owner•
2 Properties•9 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
1 stars
Over 1 year ago
Lack of investment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to transportation
Cons:
Men always on the stoop, catcalling , it’s a stop to sell weed. Landlord’s boiler is old and breaks down often, causing the heat to be inconsistent. The apt has an issue with mice and roaches but the rent is over 2,000. The landlord does not want to invest any money by hiring professional contractors to invest into the building, so he does the work himself and does it incorrectly and slow. To top it off, the windows facing each other create an open quarter and everyone throws their garbage there, causing pigeons to nest there, we had an issue where an infestation of pigeon fleas entered the apt and full extermination had to happen for 4 days. The landlord said he would create a net to stop the garbage but that never happened
Advice to owner:
Invest money in your building
1.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Do not move here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Absolutely nothing good about this apartment
Cons:
Everything. There’s a bug problem which owner initially refused to acknowledge. There is always people in front of building who DO NOT live in building loitering on the main stairs.