80 Woodruff Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11226

42 Units

Built in 1931

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 3
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Review Summary for 80 Woodruff Avenue
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent reviews for 80 Woodruff Avenue in Brooklyn highlight severe issues such as pest infestations, unresponsive management, and maintenance delays. Tenants face challenges with roaches, rats, leaks, and poor building upkeep. Management's neglect towards long-term tenants and rent-stabilized units is concerning, leading to recommendations of superficial renovations for higher rents. Despite a good location and friendly neighbors, the overall consensus points to a building in need of significant improvements in cleanliness, responsiveness, and overall care for residents' well-being.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 39 minutes ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
13.61 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit at 80 Woodruff Avenue is worse than the city .
flag
Non-hazardous
72
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Mar 19, 2025: § 27-2011 adm code cleanse to the satisfaction of this department the floors and all walls at public hall stairs all stories
Show all
flag
Hazardous
368
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 25, 2025: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective intercom system
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
130
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 01, 2025: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 1a, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
2
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Feb 27, 2025: § 27-2091(c) adm code the property has been issued an order to identify and address underlying conditions and violations related to the order. failure to comply may result in extensive repair work to correct underlying conditions and related violations by hpd. charges for repair work done pursuant to this order, if not paid, will become tax liens on the property
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
alertIcon
Alert:
One of owners and associates from this building was on the Worst Landlord Watchlist
B
Brian Garland
2.2(4)
Agent
1 Property42 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
M
Margaret Brunn
2.8(10)
Worst Landlord
Head Officer
5 Properties201 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

6 months ago
Worst apartment I’ve ever had in my life, nightmarish
Former Tenant
Pros:
The room is large and nice and SHOULD be a pleasant stay but the cons are too much
Cons:
Roach infestation, rat infestation, broken unfixed dishwasher, and the landlord/management are unresponsive and horrible. They intentionally ghost residents to force them to move out. I complained about a cockroach infestation that’s affecting the whole building and they told us to sign up for a pest control sheet for a company they quit paying for months ago. Joke of a landlord and human being
Advice to owner:
Fix your shitty ass apartment
11 months ago
Cockroaches, Mice, Shower Ceiling Hole
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are nice and friendly
Elevator that works/doesn’t trap you in it sometimes
Nice location
Cons:
Cockroaches are going to be present in the building in every unit until they gut it. Totally unfixable without major intervention.
Mice! (:
Upstairs neighbor’s shower had a hole in the tiles (which they had tried to get management to fix for months, to no avail) and we first reported leaking in January, in June the ceiling ruptured and a giant hole of mold and dripping water went unresolved for months. They do not care about you in this building. We couldn’t shower there without having mold rain down on us for months. Super and management did not care whatsoever.
Clearly preying on rent stabilized tenants who are stuck in the units due to the affordability, and using this as an excuse to be negligent in taking care of the property.
This building is owned by A&E which is a HUGE company with a team of lawyers, if you try to take them to small claims they will send their attorneys.
Advice to owner:
Do you understand that human beings, just like you, are trying to live safely in this building? Do you care?
Over 1 year ago
Great location; sucky building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pretty outside, some nice original architectural details in lobby. Street is tree lined and attractive. Relatively quiet except 1 neighbor; good closet space; bamboo flooring is new
Cons:
Roach issues; elevator breaks down frequently; door buzzer has never worked and they will not fix it; leaky pipes all over building causing frequent leak issues; took them months to respond to our leak reports, then months to fill in the 3 giant holes left by repairs with anything other than cardboard. Mushrooms were growing from the ceiling. Major leak damage evident in laundry room. Ceiling patches in my apartment from water damage are flaking from continuing leak issues. Building is supposed to have 3 clothes washers but one was removed 1.5 years ago and the other 2 break down frequently; lobby musty and gross smelling probably from water damage; our bathroom is also musty and gross smelling; our toilet seat is so old it’s peeling but I doubt they’ll replace it so haven’t asked. They appear to be pushing long time tenants out and doing superficial renovations then bringing in new tenants for more rent.
Advice to owner:
Get a soul and take care of this once beautiful building. It and the tenants deserve better
Over 2 years ago
Management is shady
Former Tenant
Pros:
Proximity to park, size of apartments
Cons:
Dirty, poorly maintained. Management clearly wants all the long term rent stabilized apartments out so they can raise rents. Cockroaches everywhere.
Advice to owner:
Get a conscience. People live in your buildings.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here