168 Kosciuszko Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11216

41 Units

Built in 2015

8 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Available Listings In 168 Kosciuszko Street
no-listing
Don't miss out on any new listings!
Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
76 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 2 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
11
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 19, 2023: section 27-2011 adm code cleanse to the satisfaction of this department the ceramic tiles surface, caulking and grouts joints of visible mold at east, south and west walls around bathtub in the bathroom located at apt 6a, 6th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
22
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Apr 28, 2024: § 27-2010, 2011, 2012 adm code remove the accumulation of refuse and/or rubbish and maintain in a clean condition the ... at compactor closet, 6th story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
8
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 28, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges door at stairs b at public hall, 4th story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Miguel Loubriel
2.8(7)
Site Manager
3 Properties82 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
D
David Silberzweig
2.8(7)
Head Officer
12 Properties98 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
M
691 Marcy Development LLC
2.8(7)
Agent
Corporate Owner
4 Properties84 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
R
Ronen Ben-josef
2.8(7)
Head Officer
4 Properties84 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Water Pressure
Cleanliness
Pest Control
Heat
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Neighbors
Garbage Management

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (5)

Over 1 year ago
Yikes! Caveat Emptor!
Former Tenant
Pros:
I like that there is a Slack forum to communicate with your neighbors. There is a lot of storage in the kitchen. My apartment gets a fair amount of sunlight. The location is pretty close to the train which is nice.
Cons:
The management is truly crummy. The garage is a disgusting joke. I live above it, and the door is so loud when it opens and closes that it literally shakes and rumbles my apartment. That’s countless times a day, very fun! Packages are often stolen from the lobby. The fixtures in the apartment are cheap and break constantly. Broken door handles, broken faucets, balcony doors that won’t properly close or lock. Heating and air units that are so old and broken you can’t adjust the settings. The building is rated a D and insulated horribly, so energy bill is seldom less than $200 a month - upwards of $400 in cold months. Maintenance requests often go ignored. Hallways are filthy and reek. Overflow of recycling bins weekly. Your basic nightmare.
Advice to owner:
Listen to your tenants. Manage requests. Fix the garage door. Maintain the building better. Insulate apartments better. Care about tenant retention.
Over 2 years ago
Great building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Recent, well maintained, good amenities, live in super
Cons:
More maintenance of the rooftop
Advice to owner:
Good and kind management, they reply fast, website dashboard not always cii ok mai d’erede, better via email
Over 2 years ago
A bad place run by worse people
Former Tenant
Pros:
It’s rent stabilized but overpriced.
Cons:
The building is for sale because the owners never paid their mortgages and are being sued by the bank-so they got evicted from their office and fled the US. The management company that took over is terrible. They have so many violations they are not able to sell the building so they are letting it fall apart while they treat the tenants terribly. It’s not safe. We’ve had many break ins due to poor security and maintenance of entrances. Many maintenance issues go unresolved and result in further issues/damage. Poor construction that results in plumbing issues, leaks, ventilation issues, fire systems not being properly maintained, poor insulation so it’s hard to keep warm or cold and so on. The windows don’t properly close so bugs can just walk in. The office managers bully/harass tenants to sign renewals with illegal rent hikes and conditions and threaten by sending brokers to your apt at all hours and threaten illegal evictions. They have been awful bullies during the pandemic and never put any safety measures in place. They fired the cleaning person last year so the supers are responsible for cleaning and are not able to properly so every amenity is a farce bc things are broken and/filthy. Most of the gym equipment has been stolen or broken. They charge you for bike storage you can’t use bc it’s a zip car garage and they get stolen daily. The super has given our the entrance codes to people collecting cans who have now started to steal things and defecate in the garage. It’s truly a nightmare and if I could afford to move right now I would live anywhere else. They are truly monsters and put on a really good show to get you to sign a lease and then leave you to deal with all of the issues for the remainder of your tenancy.
Advice to owner:
Fire Luz Simo, clear the violations and sell the building already.
Over 2 years ago
Building management issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location , new apartments with great kitchens , nice neighbors and friendly responsive supers
Cons:
A challenge to get management to deal with any building issues/ and not get ignored or harassed by them! Also the Zipcar situation in the garage has been an issue due to manager recommending that ZipCar customers access to our lobby to garage which violates tenant security, doesn’t change the door code for ZipCar access regularly, also violating tenant/ building security. The Zip Car customers have been known to loiter and also damage tenants cars( tenants pay for there own parking) as well as steal bicycles and motorcycles. They don’t care about tenants safety or well being at all. Also - we have experienced extreme package theft , when reported , rather than following up with an improved security solution current manager chooses to blame tenants and does nothing to insure a better safety situation. Management’s continued non action responses proves that when the building has suffered numerous break in’s and and other security breaches that they have continually chosen to leave tenants vulnerable and not safe.
Advice to owner:
Get a new building manager that doesn’t ignore, bully and harass tenants. Get rid of Zip Car as it violates security and safety for tenants . Maintain your building properly.
Over 2 years ago
Overall pleasant experience, with some security concerns
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive supers, kitchen/bathroom amenities
Cons:
Poor communication from landlords/building mgmt, limited resources for mitigating theft and break ins, poor security with Zipcar sharing space in parking garage—tenants have witnessed Zipcar users loitering in the garage and Zipcar staff/contractors physically break into tenant cars due to confusion over which cars Zipcar owns vs tenants.
Advice to owner:
Please discontinue relationship with Zipcar to better protect tenant security
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain full access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here