Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.08 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 05, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling and east wall in the 1st room from east located at apt 505, 5th story, 3rd apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 21, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at south wall and ceiling in the 1st room from north located at apt 211, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 04, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 409, 4th story, 3rd apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Edward Kalikow
4.1(6)
Head Officer•
1 Property•68 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Church 2415 Realty
4.1(6)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•68 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
K
Kaled Management Corp.
4.1(21)
Agent•
14 Properties•1042 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
J
Johnny Collazo
4.1(6)
Site Manager•
1 Property•68 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
4.375 stars
just now
Decent Building for the Price
Former Tenant
Pros:
The maintenance team kept things very clean, neighbors were respectful
Cons:
Constant issues with the A/C and heating units and hot water. Sometimes there was no water at all
Advice to owner:
Make improvements to the plumbing system because the rent is too high to constantly go without water/hot water, AC in the summer and heat in the winter.
3.125 stars
4 months ago
Disaster of a management company
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building itself is fine. Well insulated, thick walls, don't hear much from neighbors.
Cons:
1. the management company is a joke. you have to pay a $1000 deposit to move in. it took them almost 2 months for me to receive this back (was supposed to receive it in less than 14 days). They force you to use autopay and then double charge you for your rent, resulting in over $7,000 withdrawn from your checking account. The water is constantly being shut off (It has happened over 10 times in a year of living here) for "maintenance" but it never seems to be fixed, and when it is turned back on the water is brown for hours with little to no water pressure. 2. the maintenance is a joke. I moved in and there was damage to the floors, doors, etc. 11 months later an it still is not fixed, and I have a feeling I'll end up being the one charged for damages even though it was the previous tenant. We had a leak in our unit and it took them 3-4 days to fix the issue causing the leak.
Advice to owner:
sell the building and let someone else manage it.
3.75 stars
6 months ago
Could be better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice amenities, clean, quiet, convenient
Cons:
Hot water has been out many times, which is weird for a new building. Front door always smells like piss
Advice to owner:
Upgrade the water heating system and clean the main entrance
4.875 stars
Over 1 year ago
Nice Building with basic amenities
Former Tenant
Pros:
Basic Amenities, which is all included in the first year. Friendly tenants. Parking spaces available for additional $.
Cons:
Roommate had his bike stolen - Bikes were stored in the garage and locked up. Thief had snuck into the garage while the gate was up, and broke the bike rack and stole the bike. Owners response was to put an additional gate surrounding the bikes. Package room is a bit small and some tenants take a long time to pick up their belongings.
3.625 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nice but not worth your money
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super clean Trash taken out every day Modern
Cons:
Nothing works properly--you have all these TVs in the lounge area that can never connect to the internet, the machines in the gym don't work properly (can even use the Peloton bikes), hand dryer in the longe doesn't work and takes you MONTHS to have an issue resolved by management. Basically, they make it look like they put all this money in but in return, you get a cheap-looking space with cheap quality appliances.