237 Duffield Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Building Open Data
105 Units
Built in 2015
21 Floors
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Landlords in NYC are required to file an annual bedbug report with the city and state whether the building has had a bedbug infestation in the past year. We found no recent bedbug reports from these city filings.
Litigation History: No
Litigation history is pulled from NYC housing court records. There are no recorded housing litigations associated with this property from the past 10 years. This information does not include non-housing court cases, such as small-claims cases
Evictions: 0
Eviction information is pulled from NYC housing court records. There are no legally registered evictions associated with this property.
Rent Stabilized Units: No
We look at annual DHCR registrations to determine if a building has rent-stabilized units. It is possible that a landlord missed an annual registration and therefore the info is not reflected on openigloo. We update this data when the city updates their records. Learn more about rent-stabilizationhere
Once you submit an anonymous review for one of your rental experiences, you will gain access to the entire openigloo platform
Do you have a photo of this building?
Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
This building has a total of 12 violations which is 0.11 violations per unit for their entire portfolio.
That is better than the city average, which is 0.59 violations per unit.
Non-hazardous
8Class A
Non-Hazardous violations (i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building)
Learn More
Hazardous
2Class B
Hazardous violations (i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting)
Learn More
Immediately-hazardous
2Class C
Immediately Hazardous (i.e. rodents, inadequate heat or hot water)
Learn More
Approval DateDescriptionCurrent Status
2021-02-01Section 27-2046.1 hmc: post a proper notice of carbon monoxide detecting device requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, in a common area of a class a multiple dwelling near inspection certificate or provide notice to tenants in a private dwelling.Nov sent out
2021-02-01Section 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 17e, 17th story, 1st apartment from south at westNov sent out
2021-02-01Section 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspectedNov sent out
2020-08-11Section 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspectedNot complied with
2020-08-09Section 27-2046.1 hmc: post a proper notice of carbon monoxide detecting device requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, in a common area of a class a multiple dwelling near inspection certificate or provide notice to tenants in a private dwelling. at public hall, 1st storyNot complied with
2020-08-09Section 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspected at public hall, 1st storyNot complied with
2020-07-19Section 27-2046.1 hmc: post a proper notice of carbon monoxide detecting device requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, in a common area of a class a multiple dwelling near inspection certificate or provide notice to tenants in a private dwelling. at public hall, 1st storyNot complied with
2020-07-19Section 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspectedNot complied with
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Water Pressure
Water Pressure: 5
Cleanliness
Cleanliness: 3
Pest Control
Pest Control: 2
Heat
Heat: 5
Noise Levels
Noise Levels: 4
Owner Responsiveness
Owner Responsiveness: 5
Neighbors
Neighbors: 5
Garbage Management
Garbage Management: 5
Renter Recommendations
60% of renters recommend this building
60% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
95% of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews
3.875 stars
Great location, subpar “luxury” living
Former Tenant
Pros:
Prime location that’s easily accessible to groc...
Cons:
Considering the price you pay is about the same...
Advice to owner:
Fix the elevators and up your standards. You’re...
Report
5 stars
Great Building and location
Former Tenant
Pros:
In a great area that is close to public transpo...
Cons:
Did not have 24 hour doorman. Has been having i...
Advice to owner:
Please provide doorman
Report
1 stars
Belligerent felons live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Absolutely nothing at all
Cons:
Being threatened with murder and being racially...
Advice to owner:
Take complaints seriously.
Report
4.375 stars
Alright for the area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Price was pretty good, apartment is nice enough
Cons:
Bad water leak for the whole building last year...
Report
3.625 stars
Nice units, but lacks a doorman and packages are often stolen.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice kitchen finishes, nice bathrooms, new buil...
Cons:
There is not a dedicated doorman, and so packag...
Advice to owner:
If you want to be a "luxury" building like adve...
Report
2.5 stars
Not Great. Be Better.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Unit itself is spacious, modern and nice (1BD)....
Cons:
Unresponsive management. Not empathetic towards...
Advice to owner:
Take better care of your tenants by being more ...
Report
3.25 stars
Glad to be leaving.
Former Tenant
Pros:
It's just fine, but definitely not worth the cost.
Cons:
- Super (Bek) is blatantly racist and homophobi...
Advice to owner:
GET RID OF BEK
Report
3.75 stars
Decent for the price!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location in downtown Brooklyn with reason...
Cons:
Bad smell in the elevators. Laundry room can of...
Advice to owner:
237 Duffield could improve if you hired additio...
Report
3.5 stars
Don’t Overpay to Live Here!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Management has consistently lowered the monthly...
Cons:
Management is unprofessional
Requests from mana...
Advice to owner:
Invest in property management and work more col...
Report