U

Uriel Sanchez

Agent

•

Site Manager

•

Head Officer

•

Owner

•

Corporate Owner

•

2 Properties

•

77 Units

•
3.1(2)
Evictions: 5
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.62 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Mar 03, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code post a proper notice of smoke detector requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, at or near the mail box sign not metal at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
10
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 29, 2024: § 27-2010, 2011, 2012 adm code remove the accumulation of refuse and/or rubbish and maintain in a clean condition the approx 24sq ft at the building front south yard
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 26, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective in the entrance located at apt e2, 5th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Uriel Sanchez
Prospect Lefferts Gardens
181 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11226
54 Units • 5 Floors
2.1(1)
Bedford-Stuyvesant
216 Putnam Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11216
23 Units • 4 Floors
4.1(1)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
The super is horrible he gets drunk beat his is wife don’t like fixing. Anything
Former Tenant
Pros:
The only pros are they are some nice ppl that lives in the building and it’s close to a lot of trains and buses
Cons:
It’s had bed bugs rats they don’t clean the building the superintendent is very rude no hot water building is very dirty the lighting to the building is horrible please don’t move here. They go up on your rent every year
Advice to owner:
Fix your problems in your building they need to shut y’all down ASAP and I hope y’all have move everyone in all of y’all buildings
Over 2 years ago
It’ll do in a pinch
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very quiet, nice neighbors, awesome and responsive Supe, felt safe
Cons:
Could not get rid of roaches, shower constantly backed up, very dark in the back lower floors, cheaply made kitchen drawers kept breaking
Advice to owner:
Every apartment in that building needs to be treated for roaches as some of the neighbors are not clean. You really need to reinforce the cabinetry in the kitchen.