A

Arnesa Cekic

Officer

1 Properties

30 Units

Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.7 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
19
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 01, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the 1st room from north located at apt 5d, 5th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
48
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 01, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at all walls in the 4th room from north located at apt 5d, 5th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 19, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code & 309 m/d law abate the nuisance consisting of key operated lock installed at door leading to fire escape window in the 4th room from north located at apt 5a, 5th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Arnesa Cekic
Upper West Side
202 West 82 Street, Manhattan, NY 10024
30 Units 5 Floors
3.1(2)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
Management is Awful
Former Tenant
Pros:
Decent amount of space and great neighborhood
Cons:
Super is useless. It seems like he can’t do anything without permission from the property manager. The property manager is apathetic and incompetent. Getting anything fixed is like pulling teeth.
Advice to owner:
Actually fix stuff when I ask.
Over 1 year ago
Solid building to live in improved with new super
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pretty quiet building with friendly people.
Cons:
Precious super was really poor and there were issues with mice and roaches and general cleanliness. The condition of the place has improved under the new super.