R

Rory Kurtz

Head Officer

Shareholder

2 Properties

138 Units

Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.24 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
26
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 04, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code fire egress defective. remove obstructing bars or unlawful gates from window to fire escape or provide approved type gate in the 1st room from east at north located at apt e4, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east , section at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
8
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 08, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinge , 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Rory Kurtz
Sheepshead Bay
735 Avenue W, Brooklyn, NY 11223
100 Units 6 Floors
0(0)
Brownsville
285 East 91 Street, Brooklyn, NY 11212
38 Units 4 Floors
1.7(2)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
Renters quality of life
Former Tenant
Pros:
Trash management and recycleables
Cons:
No security cameras, loitering inside and out side main entrance by people smoking and drinking that do not reside in the building no working elevator, unusable courtyard for tenants, not enough sufficient heat provided, no energy efficient windows in the building, packages are often stolen because of lack of security and the absence of working cameras.
Advice to owner:
Stop running these apartments like low income housing or the projects. The rent is very expensive yet their are little to no services provided for tenants. Also a big ussye is no working cameras.
Over 2 years ago
I would give it a C
Former Tenant
Pros:
It’s in a fairly decent neighborhood
Cons:
The Super and his friends cooking in the back yard with loud noises and the smoke entering my Apartment , am asthmatic and shouldn’t be in Smokey environment
Advice to owner:
They should come out and check whatever is going on with the building , because when complaints are made they just don’t do anything about it