A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 15, 2023: § 27-2065 adm code provide ventilation for water closet compartment and/or bathroom and file application for approval before doing work : in the bathroom located at apt 2b, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Edwin Vargas
Lenox Hill
231 East 76 Street, Manhattan, NY 10021
90 Units • 9 Floors
3.9(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Large units, old building, new mgmt not responsive
Former Tenant
Pros:
One bedroom layout very spacious, doormen Juan and Mario are amazing
Cons:
Plumbing issues, bathroom very small, water damage under radiator and other nuances due to being older building. Went through phase with a few mice. Building seemed to go downhill with new management taking over (MGT).
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Excellent staff
Former Tenant
Pros:
As mentioned, the staff are what really put this building over the top. They have always been responsive and nice to everyone. The building itself is quite nice and the apartments well maintained,
Cons:
Honestly, I can't really think of anything of consequence. Some of the molding is slightly out of alignment?