V

Vesa Naka

Site Manager

1 Properties

15 Units

Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.73 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 21, 2016: section 300 m/d law file plans and application and legalize the following alteration or restore to the legal condition existing prior to the making of said alteration sheetrock and wood partitions erected creating rooms and bathroom at bsmt front east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 17, 2016: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardent material at ceiling and north wall at basement
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Feb 08, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 3r, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Vesa Naka
Chelsea
218 West 22 Street, Manhattan, NY 10011
15 Units 5 Floors
3.4(1)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 2 years ago
Worst Management Company
Former Tenant
Pros:
The Porter was very friendly and did an excellent job keeping the property clean
Cons:
Things were constantly breaking & now getting fixed. The management/super were non-responsive or would take days.