Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews highlight buildings managed by DANIEL ROHLMAN vary significantly. While some residents praise the cleanliness, responsiveness of management, and overall living experience, others criticize poor maintenance, pest controlissues, and unprofessional management behavior. Buildings like 4 West 103rd Street offer a positive living environment with efficient amenities, while 78 Manhattan Avenue faces severe criticism for atrocious management practices and maintenance issues. Prospective renters should weigh these mixed reviews carefully before deciding on a building managed by DANIEL ROHLMAN.
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 28, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation east riser pipe in the kitchen located at apt 2e, 2nd story, 4th apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 16, 2025: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective counter balance at upper window sash at west wall in the 5th room from north located at apt 2d, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jan 17, 2025: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at compactor closet, 5th story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Daniel Rohlman
All Upper West Side
78 Manhattan Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10025
58 Units • 5 Floors
2.3(3)
All Upper West Side
4 West 103 Street, Manhattan, NY 10025
20 Units • 5 Floors
4.3(2)
All Upper West Side
54 West 106 Street, Manhattan, NY 10025
20 Units • 5 Floors
0(0)
All Upper West Side
946 Columbus Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10025
16 Units • 5 Floors
0(0)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
4.12 stars
8 months ago
Nice building in a good location
Former Tenant
Pros:
- right next to the park and a convenient subway stop/line - quiet, friendly neighbors/very safe atmosphere - great maintenance people
Cons:
- bug problems, pest control comes by once a month but late in the evening when it's not convenient - sometime unresponsive to emails/calls, the office doesn't open til 9 so you have to wait til then to get a response
2.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Management is atrocious
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are wonderful for the most part, there’s a real sense of community in the building.
Cons:
The management company is run by a bunch of idiot sociopaths. Think the Trump brothers but with less charm, if that’s even possible. I’ve always thought people were fundamentally good at heart until I dealt with these guys. They underpay their workers and hire agents barely out of college. They do the absolute bare minimum they can get away with when it comes to maintenance. Just genuinely horrible people. Also there are rent stabilized places in here, not sure why that’s not reflected. And it’s pet friendly so there’s that.
4.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
good spot to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean, quiet, management responsive
Cons:
Random people buzzing from the street. Some of the flipped stuff (cabinets, paint) doesn’t have longevity.
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Wouldn’t Wish It On My Worst Enemy
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are friendly and so very helpful & Close to park & subways B,C,A and 1.
Cons:
In as little of words as possible… Continuous mouse infestations, less than poor pest control or means to solve the issues. LIVING AMONST MICE FOR MONTHS. Poor communication and response time for any complaints or concerns (zero urgency). Disrespectful management to tenants constantly- degrading and condescending in their nature. Maintence is typically kind and helpful but do not wear the “all-knowing crown” that management does so they only can do what they can. Lack of understanding in simple procedures (2+2=?) by both management brothers. They will hire the cheapest and most unethical/illegal people for work on the building. Hope my review saved you!
Advice to owner:
Please save us all and don’t be a property owner any longer.
4.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Nice and Newly Renovated
Former Tenant
Pros:
You literally can not hear ANYTHING from other apartments which is incredible. The floors are new, new paint, newish appliances - overall a clean building in a decent area.
Cons:
Certain units in building are not well lived in - renters faults not landlords.
2.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
You can do better than a Pine Management building!
Former Tenant
Pros:
it’s near the Park
Cons:
poorly maintained, no onsite super, lots of noise in the alley much of it by Pine Management workers, ancient washing machines and dryers, lobby and hallways are dingy and often dirty, right across from many blocks of projects, low security - packages get stolen regularly.
Advice to owner:
care a lot more about your tenants comments about how to improve living conditions