M

Michael Fleisch

Head Officer

2 Properties

100 Units

Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
Review Summary for Michael Fleisch
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews highlight buildings managed by Michael Fleisch as severely lacking in cleanliness, pest control, and owner responsiveness. Residents face issues with roaches, rats, and unaddressed repair requests. The unkept conditions, unresponsive management, and inconsistent super oversight contribute to negative experiences. Despite some positive aspects like good locations and quiet neighbors, the overall consensus is unfavorable with residents advising frequent building checks and improved communication from management. Renters do not recommend staying in these buildings due to ongoing maintenance issues and poor living conditions under Michael Fleisch's management.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 9 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.37 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is worse than the city .
flag
Non-hazardous
16
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 23, 2024: § 27-2026 adm code repair the broken or defective connection waste line under wash basin in the bathroom located at apt 6a, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
65
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 27, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective mortise lock in the entrance located at apt 6a, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 27, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinge in the entrance located at apt 6a, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Michael Fleisch
Concourse
1254 Sherman Avenue, Bronx, NY 10456
60 Units 6 Floors
2.1(1)
Crown Heights
883 Franklin Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11225
40 Units 4 Floors
2(3)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 2 years ago
Roach infected and don’t bother if you like sleep
Former Tenant
Pros:
Renovated appliances was okay
Cons:
The roaches come from within the walls and they didn’t seal edges around the apartment. Management falsely advertised a free month, they didn’t send any stove covers as promised. And the super takes two weeks to respond to one issue at a time. Just moved here and I’m already planning to leave. Don’t do it to yourself moving here. Also the rent amount they ask and living space don’t correlate. The rent price is way too high and I only moved out of convenience of it being near my mom. Fully regret it
Advice to owner:
HAVE A GOD DAMN PHONE NUMBER FOR US TO CALL management. This is ridiculous you don’t have a office number. Hope you guys get law suits for that.
Over 2 years ago
Unkept building, unresponsive management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good access to prospect park, subways, and Franklin Ave/PLG restaurant and bar offerings.
Cons:
Roach infested unit (probably 75+ roaches over 6 months), rat infested courtyard (where you take garbage), unannounced water shutoffs (at least 6 -7 times in a year), completely unresponsive management. Super means well but is overextended, thus inconsistent (if any) follow-through on repairs/requests.
Over 3 years ago
Worst place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Everyone keeps to themselves no drama
Cons:
Terrible no experience super .Management never respond. Apartments are falling apart .So much violations reported nothing done. Quick to take your money with no service
Advice to owner:
Check your buildings every 2 weeks or so.Provide and connect to the families.We are humans treat us like one
Over 3 years ago
Owners are unresponsive.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is great.
Cons:
Building is falling apart. Management is shady.
Advice to owner:
Please fix the issues that have been ongoing for YEARS!!!