Nicolas Thypin-bermeo

2 Properties

20 Units

Violations

A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
This owner/manager has a total of 17 violations which is 0.85 violations per unit for their entire portfolio.
That is worse than the city average, which is 0.59 violations per unit.
Non-hazardous
5Class A
Non-Hazardous violations (i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building)
Learn More
Hazardous
10Class B
Hazardous violations (i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting)
Learn More
Immediately-hazardous
2Class C
Immediately Hazardous (i.e. rodents, inadequate heat or hot water)
Learn More
Approval DateDescriptionCurrent Status
2018-03-11Section 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspected at public hall, 1st storyNov sent out
2016-08-05Section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at all walls and ceiling in the 3rd room from east located at apt 2, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from north at eastCertification postponment denied
2016-08-05Section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at all walls and ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 2, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from north at eastCertification postponment denied
2016-08-05Section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at all walls and ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 2, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from north at eastCertification postponment denied
2013-07-10Section 27-2005 adm code refit building front door from street to vestibule.Nov sent out

Properties (2)

Building Ratings

Water Pressure
Cleanliness
Pest Control
Heat
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Neighbors
Garbage Management

Renter Recommendations

60% of renters recommend this building

60% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

95% of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews

Not horrible but could be better

Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive super - does not live in the building (although the OG listing said he did), responsive landorld/building owner, damaged things in apartment or building will be fixed quickly.
Cons:
Garbage disposal is not frequent - do not live in any of the apartments on the floor of the trash bins, you will have trash piling up oustide of your apartment and the smell is horrible. Super is not very helpful if it isn't an emergency.
Advice to owner:
Find a better option for garbage disposal and be stricter about tenants placing their garbage inside of the bins.
Report