M

Matisse Fifty-first Realty CO LP

Corporate Owner

2 Properties

92 Units

Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
Review Summary for Matisse Fifty-first Realty CO LP
Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent tenant reviews for buildings owned by MATISSE FIFTY-FIRST REALTY CO LP indicate mixed experiences. Residents appreciate the spacious apartments and convenient locations but highlight various issues. Poor management responsiveness, maintenance delays, pest control problems, and inadequate amenities stand out as major concerns. Suggestions include improving communication, addressing maintenance promptly, and enhancing security measures. While some approve of the owner, the general recommendation is cautious due to ongoing issues. Prospective tenants should carefully consider the trade-offs between location and building conditions before deciding to rent in these properties.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 9 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.27 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
flag
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 10, 2021: section 27-2053 adm code post sign on wall of entrance story bearing name, address including apartment number if any, and telephone number of superintendent, janitor or housekeeper. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
17
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 30, 2022: section 27-2005, 2007 adm code fire egress defective. remove obstructing bars or unlawful gates from at least 1 window or provide approved type gate in the entire apartment located at apt 1a, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 13, 2023: section 27-2056.4 adm code- correct failure to notify occupants and/or to investigate lead-based paint hazards.
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Matisse Fifty-first Realty CO LP
Marble Hill
2 Adrian Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10463
82 Units 6 Floors
2.6(2)
Hell's Kitchen
314 West 51 Street, Manhattan, NY 10019
10 Units 5 Floors
2.9(2)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 2 years ago
Lots of space
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry in building, large apartment
Cons:
No closets, very outdated, not overly hot when heat works, laundry only takes coins, mice and roaches not managed, mildew smell in hallways, garbage piled up in basement, building not secure, thin walls
Over 2 years ago
Fine building. Poor management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments are a good size, and the location is great if you're looking to live in the heart of the city.
Cons:
The management company - Rialto Management - has a faux-responsiveness to any issues. Whether it is on accident, or they really think people are that stupid, I have no inkling. Either way it is unacceptable. The superintendent services company they have hired to manage the building is worthless. We have lived here a year and STILL do not have a working light/fan in our. bedroom. We've talked many times with Rialto to fix the endless issues we have with the apartment and they make a show of setting up someone to come fix something but that person will most assuredly NOT show up. The only thing you can depend on is that Rialto is not dependable. Need more anecdotal evidence? Trash service is abysmal at best, at worst it is criminal (literally! Multiple citations and summons.) The most responsive they've been is to install window guards (we have a newborn). In fact, it bordered on harassment. The ironic part is that we didn't even request them. They are required by law to have them installed so they actually worked hard to get them finished. Not to care for their tenants but to keep their own butts safe. This has only lead to more problems as now none of the windows are in the tracks, so we have full wind coming through these ancient and broken windows. The breeze literally moves our curtains. Unacceptable. The single washing machine they have is often broken, and the one light leading down the stairs is never working. The basement area is straight out of Saw 3. I always expect to see a creepy clown doll riding a little tricycle.
Advice to owner:
Do so much better. For how much you're charging for these apartments, people should AT LEAST have working lights.
Over 3 years ago
Ok to live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is good
Cons:
Smells of weed, plus some rude people live here
Advice to owner:
Give apartments to nice and decent people please
Over 3 years ago
Don’t rent here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the metro north and 1 train, light.
Great Super.
Cons:
Management not responsible, not able to fix problem in the time
Advice to owner:
Fix floors, more heat, water pressure, intercom,