NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Upper East Side
/
Lenox Hill
/
300 East 62 Street
Lenox Hill

300 East 62 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10065

110 Units

•

Built in 1986

•

31 Floors

3.9(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Review Summary for 300 East 62 Street
    Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
    Recent reviews for 300 East 62nd Street highlight the friendly doormen and helpful staff, with positive feedback on cleanliness and garbage management. However, issues include drafty windows affecting heating bills, noisy traffic surroundings, and some complaints about owner responsiveness. Despite some drawbacks, residents appreciate the building's layout and location. Suggestions include addressing draft issues, enhancing owner responsiveness, and maintaining consistent service quality. While most recommend staying in the building, improvements in noise reduction and owner communication could enhance the overall living experience for residents.
    Open Violations
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    Less than 0.01 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    The average number of violations per unit at 300 East 62 Street is better than the city.
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    0
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    C
    Cindy Espinosa
    4.2(65)
    Corporate Owner•
    115 Properties•8663 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 10
    S
    Sabrina Ramkhelawan
    3.9(3)
    Head Officer•
    2 Properties•114 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    D
    Diosma Detwiler
    3.9(3)
    Officer•
    2 Properties•114 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    T
    The Paladin Condominium
    4.2(6)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•518 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    3 minutes ago
    The Doormen are great
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Doormen are super sweet and helpful
    5 units per floor
    Great layouts
    Cons:
    Windows are VERY DRAFTY- will suck your Con Ed bill
    Board members are cheap - they got rid of our $40/month cable/wifi package
    Noisy area- right next to bridge traffic
    Advice to owner:
    None
    Over 1 year ago
    Good building, good apartment
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Excellent location.
    Personnel of building are nice. Super is very responsive.
    Building is in good state.
    Doormen in the building.
    Cons:
    Responsiveness of the owner was very bad and his representative did not do a good job.
    Advice to owner:
    Improve responsiveness and check representation.
    Over 3 years ago
    great staff, a lot of traffic and noise
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    floorplans, near primola
    Cons:
    traffic, noise, shady block btwn 2nd and 1st. not much in the area
    Advice to owner:
    condo bldg so independently owned
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here