347 44 Street,
Brooklyn, NY 11220

9 Units

Built in 1924

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
2 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.33 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 17, 2019: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Jadwiga Zakrzewski
3.3(9)
Site Manager
Shareholder
Agent
Head Officer
4 Properties33 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
E
Eppy Residences LLC
3.3(9)
Owner
Corporate Owner
4 Properties33 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
E
Epiphanius Zakrzewski
3.3(9)
Shareholder
4 Properties33 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
Pretty great and convenient apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Comvenient train, comfy apartment, big rooms
Cons:
Old appliances, small bathroom
Advice to owner:
Be nicer, but also no biggie
Over 2 years ago
Good Neighborhood Bad Landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is very conveniently located by 3 different train lines. It is in a quiet residential neighborhood with everything you need at your fingertips and the rent is very cheap.
Cons:
This building has a major pest issue and the landlord is extremely unresponsive. The chain in our toilet had broken, there was a large crack in the wall and the heat had turned on in the middle of summer; when we reached out the landlord insisted all of these issues were “our own fault”. We also had a roach infestation which was “our own fault” despite keeping our kitchen extremely clean. When we challenged her to find any filth in the kitchen she made us mop the ceiling. She continued to insist we were the only unit who had a pest issue. This was untrue as we spoke to the tenants across the hall who had the same problem. All in all, great building and location but awful landlord.