A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
This building has a total of 11 violations which is 0.68 violations per unit for their entire portfolio.
That is worse than the city average, which is 0.59 violations per unit.
Non-hazardous
4Class A
Non-Hazardous violations (i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building)
Immediately Hazardous (i.e. rodents, inadequate heat or hot water)
Learn More
Approval DateDescriptionCurrent Status
2022-03-30Section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at north wall at public hall, 2nd storyNov sent out
2021-07-16Section 27-2005 adm code refit entrance door in the bathroom located at apt 3c, 3rd story, 1st apartment from west at northNov sent out
2020-09-30Section 27-2005 adm code refit lower sashes at both windows at west wall in the 2nd room from north located at apt 4c, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at northFirst no access to re- inspect violation
2020-09-30Section 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation the cornice at southNot complied with
Property Owners and Associates
473 St John Realty Corp
Corporate Owner
2.6(6)
Property Owner Open Data
3 Properties
•
44 Units
Elcorno Martin
Agent, Site Manager, Head Officer, Shareholder, Officer
2.5(12)
Property Owner Open Data
13 Properties
•
147 Units
Hazel Martin
Corporate Owner
3(4)
Property Owner Open Data
2 Properties
•
28 Units
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Water Pressure
Water Pressure: 5
Cleanliness
Cleanliness: 3
Pest Control
Pest Control: 2
Heat
Heat: 5
Noise Levels
Noise Levels: 4
Owner Responsiveness
Owner Responsiveness: 5
Neighbors
Neighbors: 5
Garbage Management
Garbage Management: 5
Renter Recommendations
60% of renters recommend this building
60% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
95% of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews
4.125 stars
Nice old building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Cons:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Report
3.375 stars
It’s not bad
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Cons:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.