Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.
Recent reviews highlight the building's responsiveness to maintenance requests and its convenient location near public transport and amenities. However, concerns persist about older infrastructure leading to dust and mold issues, unreliable mail delivery resulting in package theft, and occasional pest problems. While some long-term residents contribute to the building's character, noise levels and cleanliness remain inconsistent. Residents also express safety concerns due to drug activities nearby. Overall, while some appreciate the rent-controlled aspect, others caution against the cleanliness and safety issues, suggesting improvements in maintenance and security protocols for a better living experience.
Reviews (4)
4.25 stars
8 months ago
278 S 2nd
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive to requests using online portal
Cons:
Older building, would not recommend for anyone with bad asthma/allergies. (Dust/mold concerns)
3.62 stars
10 months ago
Reno’d but still gritty
Former Tenant
Pros:
Units have updated finishes and management is pretty responsive to tickets. The building’s long term residents bring this place to life with new york character. The location is great for access to trains and things to do and eat.
Cons:
The building is still quite old and mail delivery is unreliable (packages are stolen often). The area does feel older than main Williamsburg.
Advice to owner:
Is there a way to reduce package theft?
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It dummy text been reported if this building dummy electronic rent payments.
Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit at 278 South 2 Street is worse than the city .
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.18 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
17
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 14, 2025: § 27-2011 adm code cleanse to the satisfaction of this department the mold on ceramic wall tiles at east wall, south wall and west wall of shower enclosure in the bathroom located at apt 2, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
41
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 14, 2025: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective ceramic wall tiles at east wall and south wall of shower enclosure in the bathroom located at apt 2, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
12
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 14, 2025: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 2, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
Tom Rosenberg
2.8(4)
Agent•
2 Properties•43 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
S
278 South 2 LLC
2.7(13)
Corporate Owner•
5 Properties•43 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Frequently Asked Questions
Unlock insights about this building
OR
Review your building to unlock access to tenant reviews OR purchase access to unlock insights about violations, complaints, infestations, and more.