A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
This building has a total of 8 violations which is 0.08 violations per unit for their entire portfolio.
That is better than the city average, which is 0.59 violations per unit.
Non-hazardous
2Class A
Non-Hazardous violations (i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building)
Immediately Hazardous (i.e. rodents, inadequate heat or hot water)
Learn More
Approval DateDescriptionCurrent Status
2021-06-30Section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective ceramic tile at north & east wall in the bathroom located at apt 5n, 5th story, 3rd apartment from north at east , section at eastFalse certification
2021-01-22Section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective wood floor in the 2nd room from north at west located at apt 1j, 1st story, 2nd apartment from south at west , section at eastNot complied with
Property Owners and Associates
Albert Torres
Site Manager
3(2)
Property Owner Open Data
1 Property
•
96 Units
Avner Skoczylas
Head Officer
3(2)
Property Owner Open Data
3 Properties
•
109 Units
Brg 3752 LLC
Corporate Owner
3(45)
Property Owner Open Data
110 Properties
•
3763 Units
Brg Management LLC
Agent
3(46)
Property Owner Open Data
114 Properties
•
4141 Units
Fausto Diaz
Officer
2.8(34)
Property Owner Open Data
50 Properties
•
2223 Units
Provident Buckingham Partners LP
Corporate Owner
3(2)
Property Owner Open Data
2 Properties
•
192 Units
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Water Pressure
Water Pressure: 5
Cleanliness
Cleanliness: 3
Pest Control
Pest Control: 2
Heat
Heat: 5
Noise Levels
Noise Levels: 4
Owner Responsiveness
Owner Responsiveness: 5
Neighbors
Neighbors: 5
Garbage Management
Garbage Management: 5
Renter Recommendations
60% of renters recommend this building
60% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
95% of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews
3.5 stars
Could be a great building if it was maintained better by Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Cons:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Advice to owner:
Need a more responsive management company!
Report
2.5 stars
Needs Serious Up keep
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Cons:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Advice to owner:
Get a real Superintendent get better Maintenanc...