Tuc Management Company Inc.

Corporate Owner

•

Agent

•

30 Properties

•

1667 Units

•

3.4(7)

Evictions: 23

Litigation History: Yes

Review Summary for Tuc Management Company Inc.

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on openigloo.

Tenants of buildings managed by TUC MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC. report a mixed experience. Some buildings boast attentive doormen, quick maintenance, security, amenities like gyms and pools, and spacious layouts, creating a comfortable living environment. However, several reviews cite issues with cleanliness, garbage management, and persistent pest problems, including cockroach infestations, which management is often slow to address. Noise from garbage trucks and building neighbors is another concern, alongside occasional unresponsiveness from management and maintenance staff. Seniors feel underserved, with calls for more social engagement. While some tenants recommend these buildings, others advise improvements in staff training, pest control, and tenant communication for a better living experience.

Open Violations

Only open violations from the last 10 years.

Data last updated 7 days ago.

The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.

BUILDING AVERAGE:

0.13 violations per unit

NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:

0.81 violation per unit

Non-hazardous

class A

i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals

MOST RECENT:

Jun 04, 2025: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.

Show all

Hazardous

120

class B

i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways

MOST RECENT:

Aug 24, 2025: § 27-2045(b)(1)(b) hmc, § 12-06, § 12-07, § 12-09 rcny repair, replace or provide an approved and operational carbon monoxide detecting device, installed in accordance with applicable law and rules defective in the entire apartment located at apt 203, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south

Show all

Immediately hazardous

class C

i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts

MOST RECENT:

Aug 07, 2025: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove device preventing door from being self-closing door sweep in the entrance located at apt 203, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west

Show all

Missing information/filings

class I

Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings

MOST RECENT:

Nov 17, 2025: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.

Show all

All Properties Associated with Tuc Management Company Inc.

Coney Island

3033 West 29 Street, Brooklyn, NY 11224

Units • Floors

0(0)

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown

Evictions: 0

Litigation History: Yes

1 Year Bedbug History: No

University Heights

2552 Webb Avenue, Bronx, NY 10468

Units • Floors

3.4(1)

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown

Evictions: 0

Litigation History: Yes

1 Year Bedbug History: No

East Harlem

309 East 118 Street, Manhattan, NY 10029

Units • Floors

0(0)

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown

Evictions: 1

Litigation History: Yes

1 Year Bedbug History: No

East Village

501 East 11 Street, Manhattan, NY 10009

Units • Floors

0(0)

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown

Evictions: 0

Litigation History: No

1 Year Bedbug History: No

Reviews (7)

2 weeks ago

Under new management and they dont care about senior interactions.

Former Tenant

Pros:

Security at front desk elevator and handicap equipt apartments. Laundry in building.

Cons:

Request for Keys take months. The noise from the garbage trucks is loud and at 3 or 4 in the morning

Advice to owner:

Have more events for the seniors let the social worker do the events that they enjoy ,file complaints with the garbage pick up for disturbing the peace at 3 and 4 am when you have elderly peopl3 being woken up from it.

5 months ago

Cockroaches in building

Former Tenant

Pros:

Great location and heating

Cons:

General lack of hygiene standards, cockroaches found in apartment nonstop during warm season

9 months ago

Gorgeous but overpriced

Former Tenant

Pros:

-attentive doormen
-very fast maintenance request response
-pool
-gym
-co-working floor
-extremely clean
-lots of monthly events

Cons:

-entitled tenants
-extremely overpriced

Over 1 year ago

55 Suffolk st

Former Tenant

Pros:

New building, good amenities, friendly doorstaff

Cons:

Expensive, Loud neighbours, crowded amenities

Over 2 years ago

Building amenities were reasonable for the neighborhood.

Former Tenant

Pros:

Building amenities were pretty good and the apartment layout was very spacious.

Cons:

The pest situation in 2020 was out of control and the super didn’t help either maybe it was harder because of Covid at the time.

Over 2 years ago

1 bedroom in Chinatown

Former Tenant

Pros:

Doorman and elevator, laundry in building

Cons:

Hallways were a bit hot

Over 4 years ago

Worse place to live

Former Tenant

Pros:

It have an elevator

Cons:

The super don’t know how to fit things. The building manager lacks interest in tenants safety, well care, and concerns.

Advice to owner:

You need to improve your staff and their service. You wasting money on your super, hire an experienced and certified one.