Openigloo home
Openigloo home

Follow us

For renters

Apartments for rent in NYCRenting tips and resourcesVerified apartment listings in NYCBuildings and owners in NYCNYC market analysis reports

For landlords

iglooIQListings quality policy

Trending neighborhoods

Apartments in AstoriaApartments in Bedford-StuyvesantApartments in BushwickApartments in ChelseaApartments in Financial DistrictApartments in SohoApartments in Upper East SideApartments in Upper West SideApartments in West VillageApartments in Williamsburg

NYC boroughs

Apartments in BronxApartments in BrooklynApartments in ManhattanApartments in QueensApartments in Staten Island

2-bedroom apartments

2-bedroom apartments in Bronx2-bedroom apartments in Brooklyn2-bedroom apartments in Manhattan2-bedroom apartments in Queens2-bedroom apartments in Staten Island

Support

FAQContact usLive support

Legal

Terms of usePrivacy policyCommunity guidelinesAgency disclosureFair housing disclosureStandard operating procedures
© 2026 Openigloo Inc. All rights reserved.
R

Richard Sica

Head Officer·11 buildings·286 units
2.7

4 reviews

Highlights

22
Evictions
17
Litigation cases

About Richard Sica

Richard Sica is a poorly regarded head officer. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 2.7/5 across 4 reviews, with 50% recommending their buildings and 25% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 22 evictions, 244 open violations, and 17 litigation cases. Data last updated August 24, 2026. Associated with 11 buildings and 286 units across The Bronx, Queens, and Manhattan, Richard Sica is a Head Officer responsible for a portfolio that spans construction eras from the 1900s to the 2010s, reflecting multiple generations of development. The portfolio spans multiple neighborhoods across The Bronx, Queens, and Manhattan. The buildings are primarily mid-rise. All of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments. Renters can review each building's ratings, reviews, and public records on its own page.

Renter recommendations

-%

Renters recommend associated buildings

-%

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant feedback for buildings managed by Richard Sica points to mixed experiences. While some buildings offer spacious apartments with decent heating and water pressure, management responsiveness tends to be slow, and pest control efforts are often insufficient. Garbage management varies widely, with some sites well-organized and others plagued by accumulation due to understaffing. Noise levels and neighbor conduct differ significantly, with certain locations facing disturbances from external traffic and unruly residents. Promised amenities, such as accessible courtyards, are sometimes withheld, leading to tenant frustration. Overall, renters advise more proactive owner involvement and better enforcement of building rules to improve living conditions.

Reviews

Former tenant·Over 1 year ago

Building Is okay

Pros

Laundry inside building, rooms are nice size. Each floor has a trash chute.

Cons

No elevator in building so higher up you are the worst off you are especially on grocery day.

Former tenant·Over 2 years ago

Complete Let-Down

Pros

1) Since building construction is new, the apartments have a lot of space. 2) There is only has 1 porter in a building with over 80 units. Despite this, the single lone porter does the best he can which is better than nothing.

Cons

1) The building is badly managed by Langsom Property Management which should come as no surprise considering this company's poor reviews with other buildings they also manage. 2) With this number of units, there is only 1 porter for the entire building that is expected to take care of the garbage in 8 refuge rooms in addition to sweeping, mopping, vacuuming all floors, and the other responsibilities that porters have. If the porter doesn't come in for whatever reason, the garbage is allowed to garbage pile up for whatever number of days the porter is out. 3) The building makes a grand show of amenities that come with the building such as a deck for residents to enjoy however the deck has NEVER opened since the year the building gots its Certificate of Occupany. This is to say nothing of the other amenities I was told when being sold on the building only to see that they have reneged on everything. 4) There has been a string of package theft inside the building even though there are cameras everywhere. From good sources, I understand the building management not only knows where who’s committing the theft but also know which residents are doing this. Despite this, the one time the local precinct responded, they have notified us that the building management is not releasing the video footage to them so nothing can be done. As a result, our packages are continously being stolen with absolutely no help from management. 5) There is a ton of noise coming from both outside and inside the building. The area is adjacent to an industrial area so heavy trucks routinely are going up and down the streets particularly early in the morning. At night, it’s common to be awakened by idiots driving their fart cars while daytime is not any better with a different set of idiots riding up and down their street in their extremely noisy ATVs and BMX bikes. If that isn’t bad enough, many residents have surround sound systems with the bass turned up so there is consistent stream of vibrations traveling through the building’s infrastructure particularly during the evening. Combine this with barking dogs kepts by residents in a building that doesn’t allow dogs then you can kiss any relative quietness good-bye. 6) There are tons of more issues with this building which is why I would NEVER recommend this building. This is doubly so when you consider that there are many rentals in the area in private homes that are cheaper or at least comparable in price without any of the issues I mentioned. Since this building has no amenities then it’s fair to compare the building to private residences. If you want to know more just go to the Facebook group at https://www.facebook.com/groups/2311578542424083.

Advice to the owners

1) Hire more porters so garbage does not get a chance to pile up if the porter is out for too long. 2) Deliver on the amenities that Langsom promised including the deck 3) Do something about the building theft since you have the tapes! As residents, we are sick and tired of worrying if our delivered package will still be there when we arrive home later in the evening. 4) Enforce your own House Rules and Regulations that you make everyone sign when they move into the building. 5) As property owner, make regular unannounced visits to the building at different times and walk thru every floor to observe what goes on. Don’t rely on the management company.

Buildings associated with RICHARD SICA

  • Rent-stabilized

    431 East 115 Street

    East Harlem

  • 19-73 38 Street
    Rent-stabilized

    19-73 38 Street

    2.9(2)

    Ditmars-Steinway

  • 431 East 136 Street
    Rent-stabilized

    431 East 136 Street

    North New York

  • 464 East 159 Street
    Rent-stabilized

    464 East 159 Street

    Melrose

Rent-stabilized

431 East 115 Street

East Harlem

19-73 38 Street
Rent-stabilized

19-73 38 Street

2.9(2)

Ditmars-Steinway

431 East 136 Street
Rent-stabilized

431 East 136 Street

North New York

464 East 159 Street
Rent-stabilized

464 East 159 Street

Melrose

Building ratings

Cleanliness

-

Trash management

-

Pest control

-

Water pressure

-

Heat

-

Neighbors

-

Noise levels

-

Owner responsiveness

-

Cleanliness

-

Trash management

-

Pest control

-

Water pressure

-

Heat

-

Neighbors

-

Noise levels

-

Owner responsiveness

-

Rents and deposits

-

Renters received their security deposits back

-

Electronic rent payments

Open violations

From past 10 years · Updated 5 days ago

Average violations per unit for this owner or associate is worse than the city average.

Owner average0.85Violations per unit
NYC average0.81Violations per unit
59Class C
Immediately hazardous

Rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts

132Class B
Hazardous

Smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways

53Class A
Non-hazardous

No peephole on a door, no street number on the building, unlawful keeping of animals

0Class I
Missing info

Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings

FAQs

Richard Sica has an average tenant rating of 2.7 out of 5 across 4 reviews.

Buildings managed by Richard Sica average 0.85 open violations per unit, more than the citywide average of 0.81.

50% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Richard Sica would recommend living there.

Richard Sica has not appeared on the NYC worst landlords list.

25% of tenants who reviewed a building managed by Richard Sica approve of how it is run.

Richard Sica has 17 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

Richard Sica owns or manages 11 buildings totalling 286 units.

Richard Sica has 22 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

R

Richard Sica

Head Officer·11 buildings·286 units
2.7

4 reviews

Follow us

For renters

Apartments for rent in NYCRenting tips and resourcesVerified apartment listings in NYCBuildings and owners in NYCNYC market analysis reports

For landlords

iglooIQListings quality policy

Trending neighborhoods

Apartments in AstoriaApartments in Bedford-StuyvesantApartments in BushwickApartments in ChelseaApartments in Financial DistrictApartments in SohoApartments in Upper East SideApartments in Upper West SideApartments in West VillageApartments in Williamsburg

NYC boroughs

Apartments in BronxApartments in BrooklynApartments in ManhattanApartments in QueensApartments in Staten Island

2-bedroom apartments

2-bedroom apartments in Bronx2-bedroom apartments in Brooklyn2-bedroom apartments in Manhattan2-bedroom apartments in Queens2-bedroom apartments in Staten Island

Support

FAQContact usLive support

Legal

Terms of usePrivacy policyCommunity guidelinesAgency disclosureFair housing disclosureStandard operating procedures
© 2026 Openigloo Inc. All rights reserved.