What do tenants say about Sima Apartments Corp?

Sima Apartments Corp has an average tenant rating of 3.5 out of 5 across 6 reviews.

How many violations does Sima Apartments Corp have across their portfolio?

Buildings managed by Sima Apartments Corp average 0.65 open violations per unit, fewer than the citywide average of 0.81.

Would renters recommend buildings managed by Sima Apartments Corp?

34% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Sima Apartments Corp would recommend living there.

Has Sima Apartments Corp had any evictions?

Sima Apartments Corp has 9 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

Has Sima Apartments Corp had any litigation cases?

Sima Apartments Corp has 11 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

How many buildings does Sima Apartments Corp own or manage?

Sima Apartments Corp owns or manages 1 building totalling 108 units.

Is Sima Apartments Corp on the worst landlords list?

Sima Apartments Corp has not appeared on the NYC worst landlords list.

Sima Apartments Corp

Corporate Owner·1 building·108 units

3.5

6 reviews

Highlights

Evictions

Litigation cases

About Sima Apartments Corp

Sima Apartments Corp is a mixed-profile corporate owner. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 3.5/5 across 6 reviews, with 34% recommending their buildings and 34% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 9 evictions, 71 open violations, and 11 litigation cases. Data last updated September 8, 2026. Sima Apartments Corp is a corporate owner associated with 1 building and 108 units across Kew Gardens in Queens. The portfolio is concentrated in Kew Gardens in Queens. The building was built in 1956, making it a mid-rise structure. All of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments. Individual building ratings, tenant reviews, and public records are on the associated building pages.

Renter recommendations

Renters recommend associated buildings

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant feedback for SIMA APARTMENTS CORP buildings points to a mixed management experience. While some appreciate the convenient locations, cleanliness, and amenities like on-site laundry, there are consistent concerns regarding pest control issues, intermittent package theft, and slow responses from management. Tenants report occasional noise problems and disruptions such as prolonged elevator repairs and power outages, impacting daily comfort. Communication with residents appears to be a key area needing improvement. Overall, potential renters can expect decent living conditions, but should anticipate variable management responsiveness and persistent infrastructure challenges.

Reviews

Former tenant·9 minutes ago

Review, 1 year tenant

Pros

Price, location, pet friendly

Cons

pests- roaches and mice, neighbors (loud at times), package safety (or lack thereof, had x1 package stolen)

Advice to the owners

Decent deal, but all the cons didn't make it worth it to me

Former tenant·6 months ago

Management non existent

Pros

Clean building, utilities included

Cons

Management is non-existent, they don’t return calls. I can’t understand why they know people are moving in and the appliances don’t work

Advice to the owners

DO BETTER people are paying enough in rent

Buildings associated with SIMA APARTMENTS CORP

Rent-stabilized
83-30 118 Street
3.5(6)
Kew Gardens

Rent-stabilized

83-30 118 Street

3.5(6)

Kew Gardens

Building ratings

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Rents and deposits

Renters received their security deposits back

Electronic rent payments

Open violations

From past 10 years · Updated 5 days ago

Average violations per unit for this owner or associate is better than the city average.

Owner average0.65Violations per unit

NYC average0.81Violations per unit

24Class C

Immediately hazardous

Rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts

42Class B

Hazardous

Smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways

5Class A

Non-hazardous

No peephole on a door, no street number on the building, unlawful keeping of animals

0Class I

Missing info

Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings

FAQs