V
Vincent Garcia
Agent
•1 Properties
•20 Units
•Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
Worst Landlords Watchlist: Unknown
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 months ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.75 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
8
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 16, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
26
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 14, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes flower pots at front stack at fire escape, 3rd story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 14, 2020: section 27-2037, 2038 hmc: provide a safe and adequate supply of electric service to the fixtures at ceilings and walls in the entire apartment located at apt 1b, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Vincent Garcia
/-73.959153,40.686135,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Bedford-Stuyvesant
51 Quincy Street, Brooklyn, NY 11238
20 Units • 4 Floors
3.4(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
New renovated apartment was beautiful but landlords ignore tenants
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great apartment with a really nice kitchen and bathroom, it was brand new when I moved in
Cons:
The landlord had his phone disconnect so whenever you called him it would just ring off the hook. He never once answered.
Advice to owner:
Pick up the damn phone
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Clean, well-renovated apartments, but not without issues.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building was extremely clean, no issues with pests whatsoever. The renovation done on our apartment was legitimately well done for the most part and nothing felt cheap.
Cons:
Neighbors were noisy and disrespectful at times, throwing trash, crab legs, in the stairwell. Blasting music at night. There was a pretty bad issue with packages getting stolen. Management said they were installing cameras but never did. Also, there was a consistent issue with the heat. Sometimes the radiators worked. Other times, they would only turn on once every few hours, leaving the apartment frigid and forcing you to use electric heaters that are both more dangerous and expensive.
Advice to owner:
Fix the heating issue!