N

Narda Ducheine

Head Officer

1 Properties

41 Units

Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.04 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 25, 2017: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector missing located at apt 2e, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Narda Ducheine
Inwood
117 Seaman Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10034
41 Units 5 Floors
3.7(2)

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
Cozy and safe but poorly managed
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are quiet and most keep to themselves. The location is nice, right near the park and local stores.
Apartments are decent and comfortable
Laundry in basement
Allows all kinds of pets
Cons:
Super is rude when confronted and ignores you when you need help if it’s not convenient for him (even though it’s literally his job to repair.) The super would try and get us to pay him for repairs that management covered to pocket the money when we were new the the building. Luckily someone warned us about this prior.
Management doesn’t like to pay for repairs they should cover unless pestered.
The laundry room needs A LOT of work. Machines break down often, are dirty most of the time.
Basement stair case and some of the basement has fly infestation when the weather gets warm.
You are not guaranteed storage
Over 2 years ago
Great community bad board
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great community with loving neighbors
Cons:
Lazy board who doesn’t do anything and rules without transparency
Advice to owner:
Create more transparency