A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.11 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Mar 27, 2022: section 27-2005 adm code replace with new the missing covers or caps at electrical outlet at east wall at public hall, 3rd story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 27, 2022: section 27-2005, 2007, 204.1 hmc code: arrange and make self-closing the doors ... in the entrance located at apt 3b, 3rd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Tomas Aponte
Upper West Side
328 West 83 Street, Manhattan, NY 10024
42 Units • 6 Floors
2.7(2)
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Do I Have To
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator & Laundry
Cons:
Lobby & door looks very inexpensive Exterior looks bad & dirty Laundry Rm doesn’t get cleaned enough Bathrooms are OLD
Advice to owner:
Take better care of bldg. make it look like you put money into it.
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Horrible rude and difficult management company
Former Tenant
Pros:
Having an elevator when it actually worked
Cons:
Horrible management company. Liked my apartment but the building wasn’t all that great and management was the worst I’ve ever had. Heat never worked not quick hot water broken elevator for months and rude rude rude management useless super
Advice to owner:
Don’t be rude and unwilling to work with your tenants cause you only push them away especially during a pandemic