What do tenants say about Lal Property Mgmt Corp?

Lal Property Mgmt Corp has an average tenant rating of 1.8 out of 5 across 4 reviews.

How many violations does Lal Property Mgmt Corp have across their portfolio?

Buildings managed by Lal Property Mgmt Corp average 1.92 open violations per unit, more than the citywide average of 0.81.

Would renters recommend buildings managed by Lal Property Mgmt Corp?

0% of tenants who reviewed buildings managed by Lal Property Mgmt Corp would recommend living there.

Is Lal Property Mgmt Corp on the worst landlords list?

Lal Property Mgmt Corp has not appeared on the NYC worst landlords list.

Is Lal Property Mgmt Corp responsive to tenants?

0% of tenants who reviewed a building managed by Lal Property Mgmt Corp approve of how it is run.

How many buildings does Lal Property Mgmt Corp own or manage?

Lal Property Mgmt Corp owns or manages 10 buildings totalling 328 units.

Has Lal Property Mgmt Corp had any litigation cases?

Lal Property Mgmt Corp has 68 housing court litigation cases across their portfolio.

Has Lal Property Mgmt Corp had any evictions?

Lal Property Mgmt Corp has 37 recorded evictions across their portfolio.

Lal Property Mgmt Corp

Corporate Owner·10 buildings·328 units

1.8

4 reviews

Highlights

Evictions

Litigation cases

About Lal Property Mgmt Corp

Lal Property Mgmt Corp is a poorly regarded corporate owner. Across their buildings, tenants rate them 1.8/5 across 4 reviews, with 0% recommending their buildings and 0% approving of them as an owner or associate. Their portfolio records 37 evictions, 632 open violations, and 68 litigation cases. Data last updated September 8, 2026. Associated with 10 buildings and 328 units across The Bronx and Manhattan, Lal Property Mgmt Corp is a corporate owner. The portfolio spans multiple neighborhoods across these boroughs, including Wakefield, Marble Hill, Hamilton Heights, Pelham Bay, Kingsbridge, Riverdale, Spuyten Duyvil, and Kingsbridge Heights. The buildings were built primarily in the 1900s, with newer construction including units from 2017. The portfolio consists of mostly mid-rise buildings. All of the associated buildings have rent-stabilized apartments.

Renter recommendations

Renters recommend associated buildings

Renters approve of this owner or associate

Review summary

Summarized from anonymous rental reviews on Openigloo.

Recent tenant feedback for buildings managed by LAL PROPERTY MGMT CORP reveals significant management challenges. Common issues include poor building cleanliness, ineffective pest control, and inadequate heating systems. Tenants frequently report slow or non-responsive management, with repairs often delayed or ignored. Garbage management is inconsistent, and some apartments suffer from maintenance neglect, such as broken appliances and safety oversights. Noise disturbances and mold problems have also been cited. Overall, renters express dissatisfaction with communication and upkeep, advising improvements in responsiveness and timely repairs to enhance living conditions. Expect a generally frustrating management experience with notable maintenance and hygiene concerns.

Reviews

Former tenant·10 minutes ago

I don’t like living here

Pros

Decent Natural light dishwasher works laundry in building

Cons

MICE IN BUILDING MOLD NEVER RESPOND TERRIBLE MANAGEMENT

Advice to the owners

do better

Former tenant·Over 3 years ago

Apartment has no light switch in an entire 2 bedroom and only has 2 outlets i

Pros

Quiet Good for commute

Cons

Roaches Rats No elevator No ac

Buildings associated with LAL PROPERTY MGMT CORP

Rent-stabilized

3804 Bailey Avenue

Kingsbridge Heights

Rent-stabilized

655 East 233 Street

Wakefield

Rent-stabilized

217 W 238 St

Kingsbridge

Rent-stabilized

1632 Hutchinson River Pkwy E

Pelham Bay

Building ratings

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Cleanliness

Trash management

Pest control

Water pressure

Heat

Neighbors

Noise levels

Owner responsiveness

Rents and deposits

Renters received their security deposits back

Electronic rent payments

Open violations

From past 10 years · Updated 5 days ago

Average violations per unit for this owner or associate is worse than the city average.

Owner average1.92Violations per unit

NYC average0.81Violations per unit

242Class C

Immediately hazardous

Rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts

275Class B

Hazardous

Smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways

112Class A

Non-hazardous

No peephole on a door, no street number on the building, unlawful keeping of animals

3Class I

Missing info

Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings

FAQs