Open Violations
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
The average number of violations per unit for this owner/associates across their portfolio is better than the city.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.2 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 28, 2017: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
All Properties Associated with Alan Roitman
/-73.97222,40.78289,14/640x640@2x?access_token=pk.eyJ1Ijoib3BlbmlnbG9vIiwiYSI6ImNsYjNmMjVwdzBjeHgzd21wYmJmZDB0eGYifQ.XZvZCOh51yXuDBE-I3Bg0A)
Upper West Side
16 West 82 Street, Manhattan, NY 10024
10 Units • 4 Floors
3.7(4)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Reviews (4)
4.38 stars
8 months ago
Great building to live in.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Excellent super and maintenance staff. Great neighborhood and location to transit. Superb pest control.
Cons:
Occasional issues with heat and hot water. Wide temperature fluctuations in unit.
2.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Worst most aggressive landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location only otherwise a run down overpriced flea bag
Cons:
Laundry in basement. Broiling hot no thermostat. Landlord an aggressive fee hungry douche. Threatens give no cure periods only a nickel and dime sleaze ready to sue at the drop of a hat. Avoid this building
Advice to owner:
Sell to someone that isn’t so greedy
4.12 stars
Over 4 years ago
Nice brownstone near park
Former Tenant
Pros:
Proximity to park, Nice neighbors, Building is well maintained but older. Landlord is very responsive if there is an issue.
Cons:
Issues with heat over the years (broken boiler).
4 stars
Over 4 years ago
Decent Building, Horrible Owner and Super
Former Tenant
Pros:
-square footage of the apartment unit
-heat
-heat
Cons:
-The owner is an extremely threatening man. Anytime I had a guest (Christmas get together, weekend guest, etc.), I received questions from the owner and super about who was staying and why. It caused me to feel like he was going to evict me any moment.
-The super refused to give us our deposit back at the end of our lease and blamed the typical ware of a very old unit with very old appliances on us. He completely used our deposit to fund what should have been his own re-investment into the property. And again, he was very verbally threatening which made us feel like we would get sued if we didn’t give him the money.
-The super entered the unit without warning me via phone or email one day to check on a maintenance issue.
-would not replace the built-in AC when it broke
-The super refused to give us our deposit back at the end of our lease and blamed the typical ware of a very old unit with very old appliances on us. He completely used our deposit to fund what should have been his own re-investment into the property. And again, he was very verbally threatening which made us feel like we would get sued if we didn’t give him the money.
-The super entered the unit without warning me via phone or email one day to check on a maintenance issue.
-would not replace the built-in AC when it broke
Advice to owner:
-Change the way you communicate with tenants. Your language is very threatening.
-Get a new super that is friendly and appears trustworthy
-Get a new super that is friendly and appears trustworthy